Pitting those who oppose citizen border patrols!

From the WA State Department of Licensing : Motor Voter rules

Oh settle down. You were making broad claims as fact (“here is a little information”), and backing them up with a wild guess (“as far as I know”). Your follow-up clarified quite a bit, but as you say, nothing’s concrete.

It would be interesting to see if there’s any official word out of your DOL to see if there’s an official policy (outside of the act setting up the motor voter situation) on requiring proof of citizenship, or whether you hit a shady branch. Because currently, the DOL has the following posted on their website:

[ul]
[/ul]

Here is an interesting article (admitedly from the Rebulicans, whe are wanting to clean up uor system right now). This is the quite that I found most interesiting and am poking around to verify.

First, I’d like to congratulate Thank Ye Sai on managing to fill such a short post with so much short sightedness and just plain ignorance.

Leaving aside issues of whether illegal immigration for know, the thought of a bunch of untrained and armed volunteers guarding the borders doesn’t exactly fill me with confidence. According to this article, volunteers have been tripping alarms which has caused the Border Patrol to have to spend investigating false alarms.

Also what happens when one of these guys sees something moving, panics and takes a shot? Remember, these guys aren’t trained like a police officer would be so likely their first impulse maybe to shoot first. Does your neighborhood watch carry firearms? Cause I’ve met my neighbors and I wouldn’t trust them with a pointy stick must less a loaded gun.

Now, your next point was that the Dems want to give the illegals the vote. I don’t suppose you have a cite for that? According to CNN,
44% of Hispanics voted for Bush, hardly the stuff that would make the Dems salivate over an influx of Hispanics. Not to mention that Hispanics tend to be fairly culturally conservative. The Cuban population in Florida is known to trend Republican and has done so for quite some time.

Be honest. Have you ever seen more tyops in a post?

I was. talking about my post, naturally

It looks like Henry Hyde introduced amendment HR 4530 to close this loophole:

Here’s a link to the bill proposition too.](http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.R.4530:)

Noe, eye have nevurr, evurr seene more misplings in wun singul post.

I was just hedging my bets, covering my ass, and using “weasel words” to avoid making accusations about things that may or may not be (weasel words again) still happening.

I had a feeling Thank Ye Whatever would be banned poste haste…

I think the joke was that “in the past” people who are now dead used to do a lot of things. Like breathe. Which they don’t do now. Because they are dead. But they used to. When they were alive.

Texas, too. Motor Voter is just plain fucked.

Just wanted to say thanks for not deleting the whole thread :slight_smile: It was irritating, as was outlined in the Pit thread about deleting threads. I appreciate the change in policy, if this represents one.

So, has anyone found any cites about motor-voter laws that counter my understanding of them? So far I have found a lot of articles and columns that were the result of the recent WA state election that are claiming that the DOL folks are required to ask if the person wants to register to vote and that they are forbidden to ask if they are citizens. I have not had any luck in finding the text of the law itself that backs this up.

It is not that I necessarily disbelieve what I have found, but all of it seems to be coming from the Republican side of the aisle (not surprising, as they were the party screwed in this election under pretty shady looking circumstances) and I would love to know if my understanding is right or wrong.

Don’t take it as a change in policy just yet. I did this on my own. Case by case basis.

Note: in many states, in order to register to vote, you don’t have to prove that you’re a U.S. citizen - you just have to attest to it. Link:

http://www.eac.gov/docs/nvra.pdf

To make a long story somewhat shorter, it’s possible that my grandmother has been voting this way since the 1930s, and after much research, I have not been able to document whether she is a U.S. citizen (though she honestly thought she was, she has no memory of naturalizing, and didn’t move to the U.S. until she was 16). I’m sure she’s not the only one.

Here in Talibama one must attest to citizenship. I cannot do so (nor will I ever do so, I am not going past residency as I do not wish to be a US citizen). One must also prove likewise for a driver’s license. I expect sometime in the future that in this state at least, one will have to prove SBC affiliation.

Further to that I am surprised at the citizenship requirement. In New Zealand and Australia one need only be a resident (after all, if you live there the policies have an impact on you). I am able to vote in New Zealand (where I am a citizen) and Australia (where I am a officially a permanent resident).

Are you sure that your permanent residency gives you the right to vote here in Australia **UnwrittenNocturne ** ? Have you actually voted in any elections since you moved here? The Australian Electoral Commission website states clearly that eligibility to vote is restricted to those aged 18 or over who are:

  • Australian citizens; or
  • British subjects who were on a Commonwealth electoral roll on 25 January 1984.

There’s no mention of voting eligibility for permanent residents who are New Zealand citizens.

He’s not living in Australia now, he’s living in the US with me. :slight_smile: But I can answer this one: Yes, he voted in elections in Australia while he was living there.