Of course it isn’t.
And if they really really want their children to eat pizza, they can buy it themselves.
I’m sympathetic to this viewpoint, but there’s something to be said for having a uniform set of guidelines as to what constitutes a nutritious meal. I suppose we could let each state decide for itself what makes for healthy meals for kids, but it seems like a duplication of effort.
And it really distracts from the actual point, which is that this particular bill wasn’t necessarily written with nutrition in mind but with trying to weigh budget requirements against dietary standards.
The “best” solution would be to get the USDA to relax its standards for what constitutes a healthy diet. But I don’t see that getting much traction politically.
Brilliant! I want one!
Very Libertarian of you. Except the damage local control would do is scary. Want some Dearborn Schools teaching the Muslim religion because there is a majority of Muslims in the area?
The Federal government tries to keep school standards somewhat even across the land.
The states are reimbursed by the federal governmentfor lunches and snacks served in public schools:
So it comes from the states in the first place, but is reimbursed from the feds in the second place, so suggesting it should “stay in the states” is disingenuous at best. Unless you can show that they would spend that money anyway, even if it were not reimbursed. :dubious:
The 1st amendment ensures that no religion is taught, as religion, in any public school, anywhere. Your slippery slope does not exist.
Pizza is actually counted as a vegetable now, the debate is about a proposal to stop counting it as a vegetable which would effectively lead to its removal from cafeteria menus because the vegetable fiction is the only reason pizza is on there in the first place.
Yes please put those other vegetables in a easy to dispose of bag along side the pizza ![]()
I, for one, am glad our good Congresscritters are ever vigilant, lest some kid somewhere has pizza for lunch. Won’t someone think of the children?
This is absurd. A proper serving a vegetables is a pile of french fries with a 4oz squirt of ketchup. Alternatively, a large scope of tater tots may be used as a substitute. Both of which need to be cooked in pure vegetable oil, as hydrogenated as possible, our kids need as much hydrogen as we get get into them.
I for one am shocked that the US government can’t figure out what a child should eat for lunch. Didn’t you guys put several men on the moon, what did those guys eat?
Tang.
We still have that food pyramid thing right? What does it say about pizza?
Pizza is basically pyramid shaped, so it should be good to go.
Isn’t a tomato actually a fruit? Did anyone tell them about that?
Nope. Replaced by MyPlatein June, 2011.
Someone writing on wikipedia has a sense of humor, even if he doesn’t have a sense of grammar:
![]()
Me neither, I don’t understand how pizza is a veggie:confused:
Did you bother reading the contents of this thread before posting that? Never mind, that’s a rhetorical question.
But tomato is considered a fruit though, so I don’t know why they are trying to make it a vegetable.