I know i don’t normally post in GD, but i thought this would be thought provoking…
i was talking with the mechanic at my local bike shop, who also happens to be a Air National Guardsman at a local USAF Reserve airfield (Refueling Wing), i discovered they had an unsecured wireless network, so i gave them reccomendations as to how and why they needed to lock it down, somehow we got to talking about the current political climate/terrorism/how it’s wrong how the Guard/Reservists are being misused…
he told me that during the London bombings, both of them, they were told to give priority to keeping the tactical bombers “hot”, he said “i can’t tell you what those aircraft were carrying, but you know what they were carrying, lets just leave it at that…”, he also said that he thinks the next terror attack to strike American soil will probably be a dirty bomb, bioweapon, or nuke, and if it’s nuclear, he doesn’t want to think about what will happen…
according to him (and yes, i know, the word of one Guardsman is just his opinion and not tactically relavent) the response will be nuclear, a massive strike against all known “bad guys” (Iraq/Iran/Syria/Afghanistan/North Korea) and will take about 15 minutes, essentially he’s claiming the next terror attack, if nuclear, will probably start WWIII
personally, i think he’s being overly dramatic and embelleshing things a bit, but then i think about who’s in the White House and who’s in control, and you can’t deny that there is the possibility of the above scenario happening, heck, quite a few civillians were calling for a nuclear response to the terror attacks of Sept. 11…
so, what do you think of the above scenario, empty posturing and playing “Armchair General” or any validity to it?..