Please place all SDMB subscription complaints in this thread, you cheapskates!

I’m sorry, but that’s just flat out false. The Reader has shown that they’re not adverse to using Paypal. A “Click to Donate” button via Paypal could be added to various places – or a simple pop-up window called from a link in a sticky thread at the top of every forum – extraordinarily easily. It’s a cut-and-paste operation. The creation of the sticky threads in each forum would take longer.

And for the umpteenth time, no one has said that they do not have $5. They have said that their personal priorities for where money is spent, even such money as might be considered “entertainment” money, may not be able to be stretched far enough to include the Dope. That’s not for anyone else to decide or pontificate about from on high. Your values for where and how to spend your money are yours and no one else’s and you have no right to attempt to impose them on other Dopers whose personal situations are unknown to you.

I’ve spoken in the past about another forum community – and that’s all that it was, forums, nothing else – that went pay-to-post. Before it went there, there were Paypal and Amazon Honor System buttons, and Amazon affiliation so that they couuld get revenues when users (and others) bought from Amazon with their name.

They sold custom user titles, which generated a massive quick inflow of cash. Yes, it took admin time, but at $5 or $10 a pop from a thousand users it was worth it.

Then they did branded merchandise – easy peasy with CafePress, and users donated the artwork and made suggestions about what kinds of things they wanted (like mugs emblazoned with one of the forum in-jokes, the equivalents of our “Hi Opal!” or 1920’s style whatevers.). When the users themselves designed the merchandise or had their input about it honored, they bought thousands of dollars worth of the stufff.

Then there were text ads and user classified ads, then expanded to offer personal ads. They added user auctions where the board got 0.5% of the revenues as a kickback. Lastly, they bought a related domain name and resold hosting for users to have their own blogs/websites.

Along the way, other features were added. A 24-hour chat room was started. Clubs were started, one that did special things for user birthdays and anniversaries, others for different weight-loss plans (separate clubs for South Beach, Atkins, Weight Watchers, etc.), another was geared to parents, another for GLBT users, and so on. They started a new member program so that every new member got a “mentor” who would give them a personally guided tour of the boards and some insights on the “personalities” of each forum. The forum owners gave their okay to using Meetup.com to do officially branded monthly meetings of forum users in a variety of different locations, all managed using meetup.com’s infrastructure.

In other words, they built a huge community with the forums as the centerpiece but with so many other aspects that meant something in the user’s lives, even if they never met another forum usr in person, even if everything they did was limited to sitting behind at their keyboards. They built up a reason for people to join, so that it wasn’t just a matter of people paying to give someone content. (Their users also retain copyright to whatever they say on their forums, which allows them to reproduce good posts in their own blogs, etc.) And when they went pay-to-post, the users also knew that it was because every other option for providing the infrastructure and bandwidth necessary to keep the community – the community that they had come to love and feel strongly connected to – alive, and so they ponied up happily and there was only about 5% attrition.

Criticisms of the lack of responsiveness to Doper suggestions for alternate revenue streams are on point. We are the community that’s supposed to be so important that we’re willing to pay cash money to be a part of it. So why was our input ignored on the topic? We are the reason that the boards exist, not vice versa, so why are we expected now to be unilaterally thrilled with being left with no other option than to pay for the pleasure of giving our words away with no recourse to an entity which could happily decide to try to turn a profit by republishing them elsewhere.

It’s really disturbing to see so many Dopers attempting to stifle any dissent or any criticism in the worst, most heavy-handed sorts of ways. Everyone is entitled to their opinion about this move, and it’s really disgusting to see so many posts which boil down to nothing more than “your opinion is wrong, so shut up.” That’s not what the Dope is about, that’s not the standard that we hold for one another or ourselve when discussing any other topic, it’s not acceptable anywhere else so it’s not acceptable here. (Yes, quixotic and Libertarian, I’m looking very pointedly at you. This discourse is beneath you both, and you know it. I’m ashamed.)

Where do you think you are, Philadelphia?

As one part of closing a $200 million budget deficit, the mayor is proposing library fees for video and DVD rentals.

Back on topic. Had this board charged a fee for people to post, I would have remained a lurker. With a 30-day trial period, maybe I would have paid the cash, maybe not.

I’ve addressed Libertarian’s last post directed at me here.

TeaElle, I wish I could please you by being the right object of your scorn, but I haven’t told anyone to shut up about any of this.

This is unbelievably stupid. Do you honestly think the SDMB could make money by re-publishing the drivel that passes for discourse in almost every single thread? The MPSIMS flirt threads, yeah, THAT’s a real cash cow!

All of you have the wrong idea–the board is not charging you to cheat you, they’re asking to help pay for yourselves. This is no different from a group of people wanting to have a party but objecting to paying for any part of it. You’ve had a good time on somebody else’s dime for 5 years, now it’s time to pony up.

Donating through Paypal is completely impractical and too irregular for the SDMB to be able to make any kind of budget. Web-based advertising isn’t a practical revenue source either. Charging for membership is the only sensible course at the moment.

If you don’t want to pay, fine. If you do want to pay, fine. But stop all this malice and backbiting over the subject.

applause

Well said.

MeanJoe

Hey you’re a good guy and you’ve been around a long time, we intend to keep you here. If it comes to that, I have some change under my bed, let me know.

I don’t have any problem at all with the $5 for the first year, I’ve been here so long and it’s been great. But after that first year who knows, I’ll wait and see. A lot will depend on (a) the quality of posting and more importantly (b) how fast the forums move. I don’t mind paying as long as it means my posts won’t get eaten as often.

I really like Something Awful’s forum pricing. $9.95 for lifetime, another $9.95 for “platinum”, $5 for an avatar, plus other random stuff you can buy. It keeps out the jerks, and people tend to learn their lesson when they get banned and have to pony up another $9.95 to come back.

This is exactly how I see it. We all have to donate a little to help with the upkeep of this community. Nobody’s cheating us. Nobody’s making money of us. Heck, it’s probably not worth the Reader’s while to keep up here. And I understand if the Dope is not your priority. I don’t consider it priority of mine, but the entertainment and informative value is worth the money, so I’ll do it. And while I said that I understand that some people perhaps have a difficulty justifying paying five dollars, I know that some of them smoke, drink, play Everquest, etc, none of which are free, none of which are essential in a budget. If that’s your priority, fine, that’s your choice to make. But I think it’s unreasonable to bitch about it.

Hm. $5. To read the ramblings of shitheads like Libertarian.

Sorry, the board just isn’t that good. It’s a pretty good free board, but it’s a pretty poor service to have to pay to contribute to. I mean, isn’t the Chicago Reader a free newspaper? If they can’t even get people to pay for the newspaper, why would I pay for the board?

Oh well, it’s a business decision. But I don’t blow kisses at the supermarket when they raise prices just because the food they sell is so tasty, and I’m not blowing kisses at the Chicago Reader. I guess I’ll move on.

Once again: *posted by Libertarian * on another pit thread

You’re a shithead, sir.

Zabali_Clawbane I’d be perfectly happy to sponsor you. No conditions, like feeding someone. *[what an utter arrogance] * I can remember being hard up. No need to feel embarrased either. I don’t know you, you don’t know me. It will, indeed, be my pleasure. I prefer posters like you, with a heart, over posters like the above mentioned dumb man.

I don’t think it’s an issue of the Reader not being able to get people to pay for their newspaper. I would wager most readers would spend up to a buck for the paper. It’s just that in the newspaper industry, the profit comes mostly from advertising, not subscriptions. They simply don’t need to charge to stay in business.

Wow.

Times MUST be hard if the possession of 500 pennies enables one to join the Bourgeois Elite.

Yes, I’ll cough up the Lincoln. One answer in GQ saved me far more than that on a purchase I made.

And if they come up with a way to sponsor indigent dopers, I’ll kick in to that, too.

Well, I think you’re both right and you’re wrong. I used to think this too, but that’s because I had no idea of how uptight businesses get whenever money is invoked. Yeah, adding a PayPal button is easy. The amount of traffic/revenue that would be generated from a MB of this size would necessitate a Premier or a Business account over there, which is not free. And whenever a business has to pay for a service, they have to investigate and evaluate their options – just like people do. Except they call it a business plan or a business model, and it’s much more involved. Would it be cheaper to set up something outside of PayPal and avoid the 2.2% + $0.30 USD to 2.9% + $0.30 USD fees for receiving money? What about accepting foreign currency transactions? There are “across the border” fees of 1% and currency conversion fees of an additional 2.5% too (all of this is gleaned from a glance at this page). Someone with some business experience – or at least a good ability to bullshit :smiley: – has to come up with some fake numbers and decide the best (read: most cost efficient) course of action. They must come up a couple different courses of action, and then sell the one their fake numbers says works best. Maybe in the case of the SDMB, there’s going with PayPal, going with a competitor (surely such exists), going with PayPal but dicking over the foreigners because they’re too much hassle, or setting up a system independent of the Internet.

So, like I said, you’re both right and your wrong. Putting up a PayPal button is easy. It’s the getting to that point where you know that you’re going with PayPal that takes time and effort.

**
Have we been reading the same threads? Here are some quotes (occasional emphasis added) without names affixed:

Bah, if the hamsters were well-fed, I’d come up with more – and there were a LOT more back when this issue was first raised a little over a year ago – but you catch my drift. If you STILL don’t, I’ll help you out. I think even the people who prioritize themselves to such an insane degree that FIVE BUCKS is outside of their budget are wrong. Sell blood. Panhandle. Walk around for an hour looking for change. Participate in a survey or a psych study. Give up a luxury for a short time to afford this one. Five bucks is five bucks. If you’re in a place where you have the ability and the time to read a message board, you’re NOT in a place where $5 is going to break the bank.
**

**
This all sounds fabulous. I hope this happens. Not that I’d buy a T-Shirt with “Hi Opal!” on it or anything, but if that’s your bag, it’s cool that the option could be out there.

But I hope you realize – and I know you do, because you said as much – that this takes time and effort. Implementing such plans and then hoping that the sporadic donations everyone keeps whining about would keep these plans on the profitable side is a foolish business model.

Now, if there’s a more steady revenue stream, like a subscription fee, is a much better approach. I suspect these ideas have been at least privately discussed. They wouldn’t be mentioned here, of course, until their feasability were assessed (see first paragraph), so as to not let people down. But I bet these ideas (or similar ones) are being tossed around behind the scenes.

But only AFTER they start to make money via subscriptions. This ain’t 1999, you don’t spend pretend money in hopes of a gigantic online return anymore :slight_smile:
**

**Who says that our input was ignored? I mean, it might have been, but that’s an awfully broad leap for you to take. The Reader knows that there are some God-Awful BRILLIANT people on this Board. I’m sure they at least looked to see if there were any other ideas that were feasible. Hell, I think it was RTFirefly who mentioned something about hardware donations in such a tone as to suggest that he had directly offered something, and then an Admin responded that it was found lacking. That – an evaluation of the alternatives and then a conclusion that Pay to Play is the only way to go – is a far more likely conclusion than any suggestions that they simply don’t give a shit about what we say and ignored all of us.
**

**
I almost wouldn’t believe it myself, but I haven’t told anyone to shut up. Not even a quick STFU! I’m not attempting to stifle anything, except people who would give $5 for someone else to register! Argh, this infuriates me! You might as well put the $5 bill in the toilet and watch yourself piss on it for the amount of return you’ll get on it. Hell, burn the bill in front of a homeless guy – it’s the same net effect, really.

But even then, I haven’t told anybody to shut up. I’ve said that such an action makes you an IDIOT, but I haven’t said shut up. I’ve just said don’t do it. Discuss it all you want. (You’ll never be right, though…)
**

**
Well, I’ve engaged in some pretty low discourses in my day, so I think you’re off mark here. And you’re ashamed? I think you need to get out more.

If you’re going to have trouble paying your $5, either because you don’t have internet-ready payment methods, or can’t spare the dough, go to ATMB, there’s a whole thread full of people willing to help in a variety of ways.

This I don’t get at all. This is a message board, not a publishing house. We’re not being asked to pay to be published, we’re being asked to pay to defray the cost of using the Reader’s resources, which they’ve been providing to us for free for a very long time now. To my knowledge, the Reader has not been making a penny off this board, it has been running it at a loss. If you think your content is so valuable, by all means start submitting it to actual publishing houses.

I dunno. I’m not staying on. But I’ll probably still lurk about and read the boards… which got me thinking: if I read a post on a subject, and have meaningful input (like, GQ, or GD, more than MPSIMS) and I don’t post b/c I’m not a member, that doesn’t hurt me- it hurts the people who are already members! That seems backwards, I dunno, but I’d rather pay for something that other people can contribute to than pay for something to keep other people out.

Or maybe I’m overestimating my value as a poster! But I’m not overestimating the value of all the random posters who won’t be around anymore. It’s kind of sad.

Anyway, y’all have fun with your subscriptions, now! Don’t post anything I wouldn’t post :cool:

No search for guest accounts?

That is so fucking stupid.

I understand why they would do that, but how many posts are we going to see that go like this?

Guest: I was wondering, what’s the deal with XYZ?

Option 1:
Member: We covered that two weeks ago. Here’s a link.

Option 2:
Member: We covered that two weeks ago. If you’re not going to bother checking first, fuck off.
As has been said, this board has always been close to an inbred lovefest/hatefest. I am one of those who think this will push it over the edge.

-Joe, would have donated

Goddamn it quixotic, I’ve kept my fucking mouth shut on this issue (and I probably still should), but you’re pissing me the fuck off with your continuing insistence that there’s no excuse for someone to be able to come up with 5 bucks for this.

And I have to say, “Yes, there fucking IS, and it’s none of your goddamn business what someone else’s priorities are.” Priorities, you say?

Fuck you, you sphinctersucking sack of shit. All kinds of things cost me money (and motherfucking monthly fees out the shitpipe)–mortgage, phone, cell phone, internet, directv, car, insurance, credit cards, water, sewer, electricity, ad-seeminglyfucking-infinitum. Do I find it worth it to drop $5 here, $5 there, $20 over here, $15/month for the fucking Tivo “service” when the goddamn satellite box gets the fucking program guides and everything from DirecTV for my monthly fee to THEM already, $5 for this, $33.50 for that, “A Dollar More” on my electric bill, $20 to go to a movie once in a while, $40/month to park my fucking car at work, goddamn it you fucking piece of shit WHERE DOES IT STOP?"

Right here.

Sure it’s only five bucks. But all of those things that “only cost five bucks” add up to a goddamn metric shitload of money.

Trust me, I understand the need for the board to go the pay route. That’s fine. It’s just that I choose not to participate at this time, as do others, and we could all appreciate simply being respected in our decisions to do what we feel like we need to do. Maybe in a few years I’ll be making $10,000 or so more than I am now, so I can do ALL of those thousands of things that “only cost five bucks.” But I, and others, have to draw the line eventually on things that are not essential. As pointed out by someone earlier, I would much rather drop the occasional extra money I have on something my fiance and I would do together. Not this. So there we are.

I’m not explicitly trying to be a jackass here, but… they’re not exactly “asking,” are they? It’s more of a “if you don’t subscribe, you don’t post.”

I understand that the Reader has been doing this at no profit (and cost to them), but they understood this when they first started the SDMB. I also understand why they would want to carry out this plan, as well (I mean it-- the Reader has been VERY generous. There is no denying this.).

This reminded me of something else I was going to mention earlier… This plan probably won’t make some people submit some of their “content” to an actual publisher (sorry, Geobabe, just using your comment as an example), but it certainly will make some go to another board.

LilShieste