The guy went from being Air Force intelligence to Army supply… not looking good for his intelligence level. Then he was forcably “honorably” discharged from the Army. Yeah, he’s a real keeper.
My gut feel is that someone is protesting the voting machines - either the machines themselves or the process of machines and no voter trails, etc. I think he is a dupe for someone who is milking this for a while before the other shoe drops.
Oh? Is that in the constitution? Is there a mental acuity requirement for holding a national office? Nope.
If there were, there should also be tests given to each voter prior to being allowed to cast a ballot. Maybe the candidates names shouldn’t even be on the ballot, only their platform. This result just proves even more that the electorate is stupid, and should not have a vote. Name recognition is the reason there are so many incumbents, people are too stupid to pay attention to campaigns, platforms, ideas… They just pull the lever (press the button, punch the chad) for whatever name the recognize most.
Any way, strange I didn’t even hear about him, since I’m in the same town as he is. In any event, I’d actually love to see him win, and end up on some interesting committee in DC. Might shake things up a bit, and you can’t lower the collective IQ of the Federal Government no matter what you do to them.
There’s still no real evidence for electoral shenanigans. Right now the best evidence is that most people didn’t know who Rawl was, some didn’t like him, and the rest just didn’t give a crap and wound up voting for Greene.
It’s easy to question it, I agree. And I can’t totally rule out something fishy. But since Rawl and others are claiming something dirty went down, at some point they need to provide actual evidence.
I suspect a glitch, if anything. Maybe the people who didn’t vote for either candidate had their vote go to Greene.
I find it amazing that they have electronic voting without a paper trail. How could anyone with even the tiniest shred of sanity think that this would be a good idea?
Well, that is sort of par for the course. The weirdest thing about the election (in my mind), was that state-wide, all lottery machines were out of service “Due to the Election” from late Monday night, through Wednesday afternoon.
Maybe we don’t actually use the ballots at all here, and just let the Pick-3/4/whatever bubblemachine determine the results?
I can maybe explain away the absentee discrepancy: People with absentee ballots have a few days to fill them out, and access to resources like the Internet while they do. So when they got to the Senate race and went “Alvin Greene? Who’s that?”, they could go online and find out “Oh, he’s nobody”, and check off Rawl. But people in the voting booth couldn’t do that, so might have voted on other criteria (random selection, “anyone but Rawl”, alphabetical order, guessing race from name, whatever).
But more votes than were cast in 25 counties? That’s completely absurd. Is there any source other than a single blog for that? Because if that actually happened, then I don’t know what South Carolina had last week, but it sure wasn’t an election.
The article gonzo linked to credits (without a link) Brad’s Blog. I can’t find that statement there.
I did find Spartanburg County results here. Precinct level results are available as a download from the “Reports” tab. These results apparently do not include absentee ballots. Nothing looks fishy to me.
Now as to the trustworthiness of the voting machines, I won’t hazard a guess, but I will chime in on the side of those who are saying that a electronic voting machine without a paper trail isn’t worth the paper it’s not printed on.
It took me awhile to find, because The Brad Blog’s layout seems to have been inspired by Angelfire, but here’s Rawls’ campaign manager, as reported in this Politico story:
:eek: (if true)
I don’t see anywhere that he claimed Greene received more votes than were cast in 25 counties, so I think that blog is mistaken.
Maybe. But Bradblog has been covering the voter machine irregularities for several years. The SC race was a horrible statistical anomaly. You can not reconcile it with math or defend with logic. It made no sense. The absentee ballots, which can be verified , were hugely in favor of Rawl. Lets face it, something is rotten in that election.