[QUOTE=Spectre of Pithecanthropus]
I do think there’s a change in the wind regarding academic libraries, and one that is unfortunate for the public. We all agree that the library is there for the students. The student is User Number One. But actually barring physical access to others, even at a private uni, as at Vanderbilt and some other private unis just seems unlibrary-like.
[/QUOTE]
I completely agree.
I’m at Johns Hopkins, and our library is open to the public, at least in terms of doing research on-site. Anyone over the age of 16 can come in, take books off the shelves, do research on the library workstations, etc. The only requirement for non-affiliates is that you present some identification as you enter, which is photocopied and, i assume, kept on file.
I think the age restriction is reasonable; you don’t want to turn academic libraries into daycare centers, and there really aren’t many books here suitable for kids anyway.
There are quite a few computers in the library, and they all have full access to the online catalog, full access to the library’s database subscriptions (JSTOR, PubMed, WorldCat, Lexis/Nexis, etc., etc.), the MS Office Suite (Word, Powerpoint, Excel), full access to the printers (for a price; printing isn’t free even for students and faculty), and available USB slots for downloading information to a USB key. Borrowing privileges are available to the public for a $200 annual fee.
I definitely think that public university libraries should be open to the general public as long as the level of access provided does not interfere with the university’s primary mission, which is to educate students. I think that certain books could be deemed off-limits to public borrowing (either due to their rarity/value or due to student demand), and i think the length of time and the number of renewals should be lower for the public than for students and faculty.
Anecdote:
I remember, on a research trip to the United States from Australia in 1999, i ran into the private university wall for the first time, and was quite shocked.
I had been doing research in the Harvard University Archives, which are open to the public. One day, i saw a reference in the manuscripts that i wanted to check in a published source, so when the Archive closed i walked around the corner to the Widener Library, which is the main building in the Harvard Library system. I was informed that access was for affiliates only, and that, in order to use the library, i would have to demonstrate to them that the source i wanted to consult was not available in any other Boston-area library. They were unwilling to deviate from this policy despite the fact that i was visiting on a grant-funded research trip from 12,000 miles away, and only had another two days in Boston before my scheduled departure.