I’ve jokingly heard it said that Rule 35 is “If there isn’t porn of it yet, there inevitably will be.”
Try finding something that isn’t porn, but has keywords that could be interpreted as porn-related. The way it works now it leaps straight from “wouldn’t offend a 1950s housewife” to “hardcore porn”, and it’s hard to find anything in between.
Beta? VHS? I’m so old I remember reels of 8 mm film!
Since everything is on an internet database, I checked the winners of the Adult Video News Awards Best Film and cross-checked the number of scenes in the Internet Adult Film Database. (Picked quasi-randomly because each was first in its table. I added 2016 just for fun.)
1984 *Scoundrels *10 scenes 81 minutes
1990 Night Trips 7 scenes 74 minutes
1995 *Sex *8 scenes 102 minutes
1999 Seven Deadly Sins 8 scenes 114 minutes
2005 The Masseuse 7 scenes 115 minutes
2016 Peter Pan XXX 5 scenes 119 minutes
Definitely a trend toward longer scenes over time.
But those movies had plots, which shortened the amount of time available for sex. Companies learned that they didn’t need to bother with plots; that wasn’t what the audience wanted. So the AVN also had a category for Best All-Sex Video. Let’s track that.
1984 C. T. (Coed Teasers) 17 scenes 81 minutes
1990 Hello Molly 9 scenes 75 minutes
1995 The Dinner Party 10 scenes 85 minutes
1999 The Voyeur 12 5 scenes 131 minutes
2005 *Stuntgirl *4 scenes 67 minutes
2016 [no longer awarded]
Also a huge shift from shorter to longer scenes.
I’ve never seen any of those films, so it’s possible that just dividing minutes by scenes doesn’t work. Not very likely, though, and certainly not for the all-sex videos.
I’ve heard quite a few people say this, and it’s really not my experience.
I spend a LOT of time online, both for work and for entertainment. I look up a LOT of things. I have also been known to look at porn online.
But in my regular, non-porn, everyday searching for information on an incredibly wide variety of subject matter, from serious historical and political subjects, to sports and movies and funny cat videos, i have only once or twice found in my search results anything that resembles pornography.
I have Safe Search turned OFF all the time.
As BigT said, a few years ago Google changed its algorithm to remove NSFW images in a general search. To get them you have to deliberately include a key word, like nude or porn. Obviously, the intent was to ensure that you couldn’t blame them if you had to justify an image appearing on your screen.
On 12 December 2012 Google removed the option to turn off the filter entirely, requiring users to enter more specific search queries to access adult content But this happens only to English sites and non-English users are still required to be careful with their local language search as Google is not filtering most of the adult contents even with safe search on and with specific keywords.
These image searches are (mostly) SFW with Safe Search turned off:
Pair of Tits
Big Cock
Pet My Pussy
Bald Snatch
Come on Eileen
Eating Muff
Swollen Lips
On the other hand, couldn’t find a phrase including “ass” which returns a bunch of donkey photos (except stubborn ass, which doesn’t really work.)
Isn’t this just like the Dope? A porn thread quickly mutates into one comparing search engine algorithms.
A long time ago we were on the mailing list for the catalog of an extensive video store with lots of porn. Some lucky person wrote snarky capsule summaries of them all. My impression was (I am an inveterate reader) that there was plenty of black porn, and interracial porn, though I never computed the percentages. I’m sure it all depended on the market.
Fair enough, although i’ve been using Google for over 15 years now, and i don’t remember seeing much in the way of unexpected porn results during regular searches even before Google changed the algorithm.
I read that Rule 35 came about because Rule 34 used to have an exception clause stating: except for Rosie O’Donnell. Which of course someone then had to break (shudder!*) :eek:
Anything outside the porn mainstream, which is white hetero oral sex & fucking, is still going to be considered a sub-genre. This includes interracial, black, gay, S&M, even anal is still considered a semi-fetish genre. The only exception is girl-on-girl, which has always been part of mainstream porn because mainstream porn’s audience is primarily hetero males and we overwhelmingly dig hot lesbian scenes*!* 
Porn is probably the only business where actors (i.e. women) can specifically refuse to work with someone based solely on their race or sexual preference (no lesbian stuff, no black guys) and routinely get away with it. It’s probably not technically legal, but nobody wants to bother trying to sue about it.
Hail Ants: It might be legal, the way theatrical casting is exempt from equal opportunity rules.
(After all, this is how porn is exempt from prostitution laws, even though people are being paid to have sex.)
Mine too
Last night, I stumbled onto a Peppa Pig video on You Tube that included two of the mommy characters actually giving birth, and the characters were engaged in things like car chases, professional wrestling, and driving monster trucks through their muddy puddles. There are satirical voice-over videos with titles like “Peppa watches porn with Grandpa Pig” or “Peppa listens to gangsta rap”.
I also heard about a woman who wrote X-rated fan fiction inspired by the movie “Cars”. 
p.s. The births weren’t graphic, but you don’t expect something like that in a program aimed at preschoolers. p.p.s. Both babies were born in their wrestling costumes. :smack: