No, it’s not Bill, it’s Hillary they want to play with in the Oval Office this time. My guess is that the pant suits are driving them wild. Even Jenna Jameson is caught up in Hillary Fever. So, is Barack a pussy, or are these girls just worried that endorsing the black guy will lower their value in the biz?
So what you’re saying is that porn stars want to visit the Oval Orifice?
At first I thought this would make sense. Porn stars live in fear that censorship will destroy their livelihood. However, Clinton does NOT seem to be the more liberal of the two democrats on the censorship issue. Obama is against censorship, whereas Clinton has voiced an opinion that something should be done with violent video games, singling out Rockstar Games for criticism.
Republicans… well, let’s just say they prefer to harass interns and solicit sex in bathrooms, but are very much against sexually explicit media depictions.
Everybody knows that once you go Barack, you never go back.
Yeah, there’s no real reasoning to it… except she kinda looks like Ellen and Holly Wellin seems to have a thing for the butch type.
Forget cigar insertion this time, my gal Hill strikes me as the type to skull fuck with a strap-on.
I’ll admit that I’d pay to see Jenna and Hillary… for the entertainment value if not the purely aesthetic.
I don’t know what the means. Don’t tell me.
I can picture Hillary finding Bill’s porn stash and hauling it out to the dumpster in big plastic garbage bags.
I’d think people in porn would support fiscal conservatism as opposed to social conservatism, since that seems to be their customer base. Consider the market for their product:
- people paying for porn on the internet, oblivious to the free stuff available
- the stereotypical raincoaters furtively patronizing the video arcade
- middle-class couples firing up the bedroom DVD player
- stressed-out business travellers who’ve been assured that the titles they rent won’t show up on the hotel bill
WAG, but I’d say 3 & 4 represents the majority of the market
I would imagine that since women who work in porn were practically all sexually abused as children, the idea of a woman getting ultimate power is very appealling to them.
I am sure you were itching to leave it at “all” but didn’t want to have to defend your hunch stated as if it were fact. I think the qualifier doesn’t do much for you, and you should go ahead and explain yourself.
Hey, I got that from Dr. Drew. Argue with him.
I know it kind of ruins porn for a lot of guys but it’s true. Virtually all of those girls you’re spanking it to in those videos are incest survivors. I know it’s a bummer, but that’s reality.
Now it’s not only abuse, but specifically incest? Are you going to back up this virtually, almost entirely, all inclusive statement or just blame it on someone else?
What do you mean by “blame it on someone else?” Blame what? I have no idea what that question means.
Anyway, the serious answer is that Drew Pinsky (and I’ve seen this elsewhere too, but Pinsky used to talk about this all the time on his radio show), used to claim (without qualification) that ALL women in the hardcore porn industry (not talking about skin mags or strippers, just actual hardcore fucking) had suffered some kind of abuse or trauma – usually sexual but sometimes just physical abuse or abandonment. Adam Carolla always bitched at Drew for ruining porn for him. Drew used to ridicule the oft heard line from some porn chicks that “Oh, I’m just really sexual” or other such industry nonsense. There you go. That’s my cite and I believe it. You are welcome to believe whatever you want, but your indignation is kind of mysterious to me. Did I really say anything outrageous.
Yeah, well, Dr. Drew also says marijuana is addictive so I’ll take my portion extra salty, thanks. He seems to be REALLY hung up on the child sex abuse thing though–makes me wonder what skeletons are in HIS closet!
Actually what he says is that marijuana is addictive for people who are addicts. For people who are not addicts, he says it’s pretty much harmless. Drew (who actually is a addiction medicine specialist, not just some uncredentialed blowhard like me) draws a distinction between “addiction” and “physical dependency.” They are two different things. People who have the gene will become “addicted” to things which do not necessarily cause physical dependency (like gambling or sex, for instance) and do not cause depency in people who do not have the gene. You have to understand that when Drew is talking about marijuana addiction (and I used to get pissed and yell at the radio when he talked about it too until I got a better handle on what he was saying), he’s talking about it in the same way he would refer to a gambling or a porn addiction. I’ve heard him say many times that not everybody who smokes pot gets adicted to it. It’s not the pot per se that’s addictive, it’s just that the use of marijuana becomes compulsive to people who have the addiction gene.
I also wonder about his thing with child sexual abuse, but he’s so often accurate and intuitive about it that I’ve come to believe him.
Porn Stars Want Clit’n
Don’t we all.
I’m not indignant, and there is nothing mysterious about it. You said something that I would consider extraordinary, and I asked for proof commensurate with the magnitude of the claim.
I hope you are not trying to poison the well and suggest that I’m objecting because of some unsavory allegiance to pornography. I’d find that exceptionally disingenuous, even for you.
Let’s review your most extraordinary claim: nearly all (or literally all, as you paraphrase Dr. Drew) women in porn are incest survivors. Not women who are prostitutes, or drug addicts, but women in porn. I find that incredible, in the purest sense of the word.
I detect a faint whiff of agenda, here…
There’s nothing extraordinary about it all. It’s a rather unremarkable and self-evident observation as far as I’m concerned.
And I have no problem either with pornography or with anyone having an allegiance to it. I suspect that your indignation is a function of you having a problem with me personally, not my commenting on a widely known aspect of the porn industry.
For the record, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with the porn industry. The porn industry didn’t molest these girls, their step-dads did.