Fluid intelligence allows you to gain more intelligence and knowledge. Static intelligence is written in stone.
Just because: Matthew 5:42-48
42 if u makes a cookie 4 some1, doe not eated it
43 Ceiling Cat iz liek “wuv ur BFFz, hate bad kittehz”
44 but im liek “wuv bad kittehz 2”
45 u r all Ceiling Catz kittenz. Sun shines on good kittehz and bad. Also rain 
46 if u wuv only ur BFFs, u can not has cheezburger. even teh IRS d00dz do taht!
47 if u iz liek “oh hai” 2 only ur BFFs, wtf? only n00bz do taht.
48 b k00l liek Ceiling Cat
In that case, static intelligence is what you have, and fluid intelligence is what atheists/agnostics have. We are willing to accept the existence of a god if there is any proof on the matter. You on the other hand will accept the existence of god statically regardless of whether proof exists or not.
As you’re using it, “fluid intelligence” is nothing but a poorly descriptive term for “blind faith”. The only thing “fluid” about it is the way your rationalizations must always be in flux in order to support the same conclusion in the face of changing evidence.
Well not a prophet certainly, but “preach” is all you do in almost all threads that you jump in where there is a discussion of religion. Just listen to yourself speak and tell yourself if you are not preaching!!
Preach, preach, preach, and preach!!
People take drugs and have ‘personal experiences’! The mentally ill have ‘personal experiences’! The word for such ‘personal experiences’ that have no foundation in reality is ‘delusions’.
I have no idea what you are saying, if anything.
Sorry, I have personal experience with God, and that is why I believe. I am not qualified to judge why you do not believe in God.
If all gods are merely reflections of the One True God, is it possible for two different reflections to exist, each with a set of characteristics that is entirely contradictory to the other, and still be valid or true?
There was nothing I said that asked you to change your beliefs, mostly informational statements from my personal experience. Preaching is usually a morallistic rebuke or sermon designed to motivate people into some kind of belief or action. I have said many times it is not important what one believes unless they harm themselves or others with it. All people have personal experiences all the time, actually there is no other way to live life except through personal experiences. One person is not qualified to judge another’s personal experience. Only the ignorant judge, the wise learn.
No, the contradictions are only in the minds of men, they have no effect on God. The only truth about God is: God is Love. All major religions recognize this, it is when religions go further than this contradictions appear.
How is it possible to be so certain about that, without ever being able to be certain about any of the other supposed characteristics?
Just out of curiosity, lekatt, did this “experience” you speak of actually talk to you?
lol. Thaz K. Ceilin Cat BFFz u. srlsy
Because this is the one thing all religions agree upon, and it is what I experienced when in the presence of God.
Yes.
What?
And what did it say?
You experienced love or you experienced god telling you he is love?
It said, “Go back on your Risperidone.”
<snort!>