100% Kucinich
95% Sharpton
90% Kerry
86% Dean
80% Edwards
11% Bush (these must have been the no opinion answers).
FilmGeek, your not the only uber-liberal.
I’ve been falling under the Edwards spell, and the stuff I disagree with him on are not my hot button items, or we fell the same but in a different degree. I wish he was a bit more politically-seasoned because I think he is a better choice than Kerry, except that Kerry may get more swing voters than Edwards due to the difference in experience.
Even if I am closest politically to Sharpton, there’s no way I’m a “100% match.” In the same way, I doubt that other Dopers are 100% matches with Kucinich, Bush, etc.
It would have been better if the site tells you more about how close you actually are to each candidate, rather than grade you on a curve and claim you were 100% in agreement with a candidate.
Sounds about right to me. After I had read the first replies to this topic, I was afraid that I too would be 100 percent in agreement with Bush. (seemed like everyone was at first)
Yeah, I think the 100% is a bit off. If you do a comparison of all candidates, it gives you their answers… I know I answered quite a bit differently than Kucinich at times. I think that the site is just “guess-timating”.
In any case…
Kucinich: 100%
Sharpton: 90%
Kerry: 88%
Dean: 81%
Edwards: 80%
Bush: 16% (And, to be quite frank, I’m surprised he got that.)
I wish this would be retroactive for the last election… I’d like to see how I would have done with McCain. (Why oh why did you Republicans have to go for Bush?)