Perhaps, in retrospect, I should have posed this as a hypothetical question: Are pro-lifers willing to gestate embryos/maintain their frozen state, in order to keep them from being snuffed by default?
No actual solicitation of anything more than productive than enlightened clarification of the conundrum and its effect on personal belief constructs, was intended. I did not, and would not, post a Paypal link, even if I had one. The point was made. If someone felt so strongly about saving fetuses that she was willing to gestate one lest it be lost, then it is a win-win situation.
Inquiries upon the normal channels have been made. But the opportunity to make someone think, perhaps enlighten someone, is irresistable.
Okay, point taken.
Although my natural posting style is irrepressively ruthless, I will consider what my intention is in a given forum, and what I am really trying to accomplish. Tail-pulling wasn’t the prime directive. 
Well then, I’ll let it go at that and I sincerely wish your sister and yourself good luck in your search for surrogate mothers and I will sincerely pray for her success… 
First of all, I believe that your OP would be analogous to saying: “All right all of you 2nd amendment-ers, you’re so in favor of guns, are you willing to ACT on is? My ex-husband just called and he’s coming over to blow off my head with a shotgun. Are you willing to come over to my trailer and put on a Scopata wig and makeup and lie in my bed and take that shotgun blast to the face? No? Hypocrite!!! Die, hypocrite, die!!!”
Secondly, I’m willing to wager that anyone who is SO pro-life to be against aborting a frozen embryo would also be of the position that the process that produced them was, in effect, an immoral act of ‘playing God’. *
*(It should go without saying, but I’m willing to be educated/refuted on this)
How come Europe, of all places, has laws against how many embryos can be created/implanted at one time, but the US thinks it’s a great idea to stick 8 or more in a woman all at once?
Yeah, yeah, sometimes they don’t “take” and the more you implant, the greater the chance you’ll get at least one kid.
I still think that if you don’t want 8 babies, you shouldn’t create them because you may end up carrying 8 babies, who will be born extremely premature and at risk for all sorts of bad stuff, IF they survive to begin with. Yeah, stuff like that happens every day, even to parents who don’t even do IVF. If you can PREVENT that by not going hog wild and implanting as many embryos as possible, why the hell wouldn’t you?
Willing to raise 3 kids? Great. Implant 3 at a time, see what happens. Rinse. Repeat. Yeah, you may have more than one pregnancy, but if you’ve got the means to be playing around in a petri dish to begin with, you should be able to fork it over for more than one delivery at the hospital. You may end up with 2 kids out of 2 different pregnancies and the insurance runs out and there’s no coverage for a third IVF pregnancy. Ya know what? Tough shit. Two kids, out of the three you wanted, is better than none. Even people who need no help at all conceiving don’t always get what they want. Why should 6 children be conceived and then 3 aborted, OR 6 premature, sick children be born when Mom and Dad only wanted 3 healthy kids, when this mess could so easily be avoided?
If doctors and people doing IVF would just use their brains we wouldn’t have issues such as the one described in the OP.