Because your thoughts are presented incoherently and without regard to established grammar rules.
When it comes to more complex topics, I will always be like this.
:dubious:
:smack:
So, there’s no reasonable expectation of having a coherent conversation with you about more complex topics?
So, we might as well not bother responding to or reading your posts?
CMC fnord!
I have lost brain cells reading through this thread.
I wanted to be able to say (I don’t know why) that I had tried. Really tried. Like climbing a mountain. Or something.
I am actually the one losing brain cells
If you want me to learn then actually post me something to read
I will await an intersectionality 101 page
:smack:
Didn’t I just say you don’t learn overnight?
Yes, I tend to poorly research my topics. But I HATE it, when people try sound sound smart right away.
If there’s any real male privileges out there, not including the reproductive benefits such as menopause, then I will read them and I acknowledge that even the most opressed of men can benefit.
Nm, changed my mind.
Alright thanks, will be awaiting and in the meantime will have popcorn and soda 
…yet you managed to write a post like this on the topic of gun control?
Knock yourself out, kiddo.
Physician, heal thyself.
CMC fnord!
I gotta be honest, that’s just some 8th grade knowledge regarding the constitution right there and even then I had to google some info again to recheck.
Since this editor only has a time limit of 5 minutes…
But I am not joking when I say that, you know that US History in 8th grade is for sure a very stimulating class(for me it was), we even discussed women’s suffrage which perhaps was the closest thing to the Civil Rights stuff.
107 posts in and no one has posted you anything to read on intersectionality? You are not reading this thread. There have been many.
Think I’ll go see what Inigo’s been posting. Very soothing.
Except the problem is the posts all just to prove me incorrect or don’t have anything that accompanies their post
But at least to show I know how the concept/dynamic developed over time, I will add to the topic
The concept of intersectionality is intended to illuminate dynamics that have too often been overlooked in feminist movements and theory. As articulated by bell hooks, such an approach “challenged the notion that ‘gender’ was the primary factor determining a woman’s fate”.
This exploration sprang from a historical exclusion of black women from the feminist movement that had been challenged since at least the 1800s by black feminists such as Anna Julia Cooper. In many ways, the introduction of intersectional theory supported claims made by women of color that they belong in both of these political spheres.
Now keep in mind this was literally when both women’s suffrage and Civil Rights were happening, but the reason I think the concept fails in modern times because well times have changed…
White and Asian women make up the most college graduates and having been doing so for what I heard the last 20 years?
So according to the dynamic is that the sex is literally the determiner of fate, but this begs to challenge it.
You did not write that.
Yes I did sir.
When you pose a topic and ask for clarification, and then people give you clarification, how is that different that what you were expecting? If you can’t accept some correction, or clarification, then perhaps you shouldn’t be asking.