Luciano700:
Except the problem is the posts all just to prove me incorrect or don’t have anything that accompanies their post
But at least to show I know how the concept/dynamic developed over time, I will add to the topic
**The concept of intersectionality is intended to illuminate dynamics that have too often been overlooked in feminist movements and theory. As articulated by bell hooks, such an approach “challenged the notion that ‘gender’ was the primary factor determining a woman’s fate”.
This exploration sprang from a historical exclusion of black women from the feminist movement that had been challenged since at least the 1800s by black feminists such as Anna Julia Cooper. In many ways, the introduction of intersectional theory supported claims made by women of color that they belong in both of these political spheres.**
Now keep in mind this was literally when both women’s suffrage and Civil Rights were happening, but the reason I think the concept fails in modern times because well times have changed…
White and Asian women make up the most college graduates and having been doing so for what I heard the last 20 years?
So according to the dynamic is that the sex is literally the determiner of fate, but this begs to challenge it.
Beckdawrek:
You did not write that.
Luciano700:
Yes I did sir.
No, you didn’t. This page has the same quote as the highlighted above. Shall I keep looking?
As articulated by bell hooks, such an approach “challenged the notion that ‘gender’ was the primary factor determining a woman’s fate.”[4] This exploration sprang from a historical exclusion of black women from the feminist movement that had been challenged since at least the 1800s by black feminists such as Anna Julia Cooper. In many ways, the introduction of intersectional theory supported claims made by women of color that they belong in both of these political spheres.
Looks like you made a few edits, but that’s the same source.
Sunny_Daze:
No, you didn’t. This page has the same quote as the highlighted above. Shall I keep looking?
Looks like you made a few edits, but that’s the same source.
I didn’t even use that source, yes I read the Wikipedia article on Intersectionality once and typed a bit out of memory, hell I never even heard of Revolvy.
Sunny_Daze:
When you pose a topic and ask for clarification, and then people give you clarification, how is that different that what you were expecting? If you can’t accept some correction, or clarification, then perhaps you shouldn’t be asking.
You know just having a different thinking ability than others I guess.
As articulated by bell hooks, such an approach “challenged the notion that ‘gender’ was the primary factor determining a woman’s fate”. This exploration sprang from a historical exclusion of black women from the feminist movement that had been challenged since at least the 1800s by black feminists such as Anna Julia Cooper. In many ways, the introduction of intersectional theory supported claims made by women of color that they belong in both of these political spheres.
As articulated by bell hooks, such an approach “challenged the notion that ‘gender’ was the primary factor determining a woman’s fate.” This exploration sprang from a historical exclusion of black women from the feminist movement that had been challenged since at least the 1800s by black feminists such as Anna Julia Cooper. In many ways, the introduction of intersectional theory supported claims made by women of color that they belong in both of these political spheres.
That’s an amazing memory you have there . . . or in other words, ‘pull the other one, it’s got bells on it’!
CMC fnord!
I’m closing this thread. Luciano700 , if you’re going to be taken seriously, copying from any site, Wikipedia or otherwise, and claiming its your own won’t fly.