So, I’ll just go through the arguments presented in this thread, rather than responding to posters individually:
Argument #1: State does not allow party registration.
Yep, that would make this useless in those states. I guess these are open primary states?
Argument #2: People should work to change the Democratic Party from within.
Agreed. But not everybody has time to do this. And as someone who has tried to volunteer with the Democratic Party before, boy, do they not make it easy. It’s almost as if they want to keep you out.
But aside from that, the original message said not to change your registration if you were active in the Democratic Party. So, while this is a valid point generally, I don’t see how it applies to this.
Argument #3: Marshmallow’s Argument… Okay, I’m really not sure what’s being argued here.
Argument #4: It’s better to elect progressive Democrats in the primary.
Agreed. But again, this doesn’t apply to people who vote in the primary, and a lot of people simply don’t vote in primaries. I guess I’m not seeing the argument.
Argument #5: We should write-in someone against Obama.
Very few people are going to do it, and if the Dems aren’t going to pay attention to registration changes why would they pay attention to write-ins? Hell, when Kennedy brought an actual fight to the floor against Carter, that only prompted them to shift right. I just don’t see how a write-in is any more effective.
Argument #6: It will give fuel to the right.
I don’t see how. Explanations?
I’m in a hurry, so sorry I can’t be more thorough.