Because sometimes simply PALATR just isn’t enough fun, so you engage them, as well, for continued laughing.
I’ll take your word for it.
(Also, what?)
While I’m aware that prr has been Pitted before, this is the first time I’d encountered Pit-worthy behavior by him. (Maybe I’ve just been lucky with my choice of threads over the past several years.) I’ve met him in person and he’d seemed perfectly reasonable, so I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until it was clear that he was rigging the game.
And then I thought maybe he really didn’t understand the extent to which he was rigging the game, and perhaps I could explain it to him. And then I thought I could at least make him come up with some sort of pseudo-justification for his rule set whose falseness would be easy to point out. And finally, I stuck around a little longer because I have a hard time disengaging from a debate. (I need a 12-step program for that. :))
And after that, I was simply pissed. Hence this thread.
It’s a rebus. That is, if you took a picture of a whale, then a picture of a barrel of oil, then a picture of a side of beef, then a picture of a fish on a hook, you could pronounce them as described by 'luci, above.
Say them with the right slurs and elisions, and you’ve got “Well, I’ll be fooked (fucked).”
Also, you have to be Texan.
I believe the proper reading of the user name of the PoS (that’s Poster of Scrutiny, you scandal monger) is Pseudointellectual retard retard.
(cough, cough)
I disagree that prr is a waste of carbon, though. Back of the envelope, he’s got about 18kg of the stuff locked away - that’s 66kg of CO[sub]2[/sub] not contributing to global warming. Not much, but every little helps. Unfortunately, we have to counterbalance that against maybe 75kg of water that could be doing something useful, so it’s swings and roundabouts again. We can’t have everything.
Well, that gets me halfway there. What’s it got t do with Scotch?
Everything does eventually.
Regards,
Shodan
OR it could be what happened with Homo sapiens sapiens, with the introduction of Homo sapiens neanderthalis, with the discovery that modern humans and Neanderthals could interbreed freely. meaning they can be considered the same species.
I’m afraid that may not make much sense, but I’m tired and I’m sure others can clarify.
In reply to prr’s post 189 in the original thread:
First off, prr, you should be aware that my apology was to tomndebb for having necessitated his intervention. There’s a nontrival amount of work involved on the part of mods and admins in keeping this zoo running on an even keel. I should have the decency to not add to their workload. Having failed in that, I felt I owed tom an apology.
I didn’t feel an apology was due you, in view of remarks like “no thanks to RT’ s attempts to turn this into the Pit-lite,” given remarks on your part like
which I’d detailed in post 165, some 20+ posts earlier. (And there was more of the same after that, of course.) Not that I was innocent myself, but in view of that, it’s hard for me to trust, or want to apologize to, someone who’s trying to dump all the blame on me for the tone of the discussion when they’ve done more than their share of poisoning the well.
I’m trying to figure out on what basis. I meant what I said in the post tomndebb intervened over: when you said
if that’s really what you thought, then you really can’t read, because it doesn’t bother me in the least that you don’t believe that Jesus wasn’t the only begotten son of God. This board’s full of people who don’t believe that, and good luck in finding an instance of my taking anyone to task for it.
Alternatively, I suppose, you could be trying to distort my dislike of your logic into a dislike of your nonbelief just so you don’t have to defend your logic. I can’t really determine your motives, but there’s an argument to be made for this, given your reluctance to make a case for the rules of your game.
Why should I? If the premise is that some omniscient entity will return the person invited if you’ve managed to describe exactly one person in history, rather than 0 persons or 2 or more persons, that’s the essential standard, and there’s no earthly reason why that wouldn’t be every bit as high as it needed to be.
You’ve never tried to explain why additional standards would be necessary; all they could do that the essential standard wouldn’t do would be to exclude actual historical figures who could otherwise be invited, or at least make it considerably trickier to get them to the dinner table.
Absent such an explanation, there’s no sense, no underlying logic, to the game.
And for that reason, there’s no interest on anyone’s part in playing it. Hopefully you’ve noticed that nobody at all has cared to play your game; you’ve driven everyone off. It’s not just me. I’ve just been more persistent in trying to wrestle with you over this.
I don’t care. The rules make no sense to me, I don’t find their logic interesting, let alone compelling.
And no, it’s got nothing to do with whether Jesus actually lived, or your opinion versus mine concerning the likelihood of his having existed. Your continual assertion that that is why I don’t like your game has no basis in anything that I’ve said in the thread, and is totally disingenuous. I’ve got no reason to think you’re going to stop blaming all your problems in this thread on God.
Being more clear when you’re clarifying the rules (like letting us know that that’s what you were doing) would have been a good thing along the way, but it’s way late for that.
Nah, no point in a fresh start. Sorry.