Psychics.

You know, psychic, if you want to separate a fool and his money, more power to ya. It’s not like the gal who needs to know, “does he really like me” was going to be donating to the library anyway.

But, when you’re stringing grieving parents along for your own means, you’re really doing something almost evil.

From here. Subscription may be required. It’s about a guy who was found dead under a bridge. Police say he fell.

And,

I’ve followed this story because it’s pretty close to my house. My wife and I walk the dogs under that bridge all the time. It seems pretty clear that it was silly accident, and then you get this absolutely immoral, moronic psychic stringing this family along with such stupid stuff.

It frosts my ass on so many levels.

That is sad. The sidekick probably made her prediction before the body was found and now has to maintain her (wrong) prediction or lose her ‘credibility’ (not that she has any). Sad.

One TV psychic charges over $900 an hour.
For a few trite phrases, thus exploiting grieving victims. :rolleyes:

That’s what Sylvia Browne does. A couple of years ago, she kept insisting that a missing girl was safe and sound on the other side of the world, until her body was found within a few miles of her home in an area that had already been extensively searched.

Aw, I misread the title as “Physics” and I was ready to come in here all “Amen, brother/ Sister!”
This is attention-profiteering. I hate these guys. Any kind of profiteering off the stupid and gullible is uncool. This is the emotional equivalent of rent-to-own or high-interest credit.

Relevant of very little, I can remember a night about 15 years ago when I was awake at 3 a.m. and noticed my mother’s car had to be moved to the opposite side of the street, as per alternate-side partking regulations. When I started the car, though, I drove on a whim from downtown Montreal to the bedroom community of Dorion, some 27 miles west. I just had some things to mull over, but it occured to me afterward that if I’d been clobbered by a drunk driver, my family would be wondering for the rest of their lives what the hell was Bryan doing in Dorion at 3 o’clock in the morning? The dead kid has left a similar conundrum for his folks and the simplest explanation (a spur-of-the-moment drunken stroll ending in an accident) is understandably unsatisfying.

Ooooh, could you find an article about that? My mother is a fan of Brown’s, and I’m constantly trying to convince her otherwise. (Even though she gets very defensive).

Arrgh, Sylvia Browne drives me nuts. I heard her claim on Montel William’s Show that some audience member’s pool was losing water because aliens were coming to siphon it up at night. Yes, that’s right, aliens. Never mind the possibility that the pool could have a leak somewhere. :rolleyes:

Kind of like Psi-Tech and the Elizabeth Smart case. They said that telling if someone was dead or alive was the easiest and most reliable thing. They, said that the young miss Smart was dead. However, thankfully, she is still alive.

That second link is really remarkable.

To hear someone justifying what went wrong with predicting a little girl’s death.

And the GALL that these publicity seekers must have to write this

It’s one of those things that makes you say, “have you no shred of deceny left”. (or whatever that line is)

These people make me friggin’ sick.

I’ll try.

In the meantime, I found something similar from 2003 (cached due to expired domain name).

Okay, I tracked down the story I was thinking of to one of her appearances with Montel Williams.

Lies are bad (because truth is important). Lies that foster more basic untruths (for example, that psychics know truths that the rest of us cannot) are worse, because they enable other liars. Lies that foster basic untruths in order to collect money are still worse, because money is important. Lies that foster basic untruths in order to collect money from the poor, ignorant and fearful (because they prey upon the especially vulnerable) are still worse. And lies that so foster basic untruths in order to collect money from uniquely vulnerable people and are later denied when they are disproven are even yet still worse, because that negates responsibility and accountability for one’s actions, after which any crime is possible.

In short, Dante postulated too few levels of Hell.

Opal Jo’s remains were found 10 miles from her grandparents’ house, the apparent point of her abduction.

I was all ready to chime in with a Jonathan Edwards-bashing (carnival people do a better job), but once I read the Liz Smart/Psi-Tech “apology”, I was amazed.

I don’t think “Gall” is the word for it. When you wrap a con-man (or -woman) in a thick layer of self-delusion, it’s amazing what you can get.

There’s a part of me that wants to lay blame on parents who would even consider talking these shysters at face value, but then I think about what frame of mind they must be in. It’s really the perfect business. You’re set up as the very last possible hope of “investigation”, and your deliverables are only guesses/intuition. And then, if by some statistical anomaly you get a “hit” that is correct, your business is set for life.

What gets me in the Smart case is what I think happened…

Psi-Tech: “Oh…I’m tired from guessing”
Pater Smart: “I need you”
PT: “Oh, let’;s just tell him she’s dead…it’s the most likely guess.”

Kudos for the branding, though…“Psi-Tech” reminds me of a computer manufacturer…nice and reliable.

Man, I’d like to believe this stuff has a basis in fact, but all I can see is hokum.

Hurkos was a Dutch “psychic” who was consulted on several important murder case…including the “Boston Strangler” serial murders of the early 1960’s. He made a pest of himself and generally impeded the investigations. Not ONE lead given by Hurkos resulted in any arrests or even suspects.
Hurkos was thoroughly investigated by a Dutch homicide detective, and all of his leads were found to be worthless-yet people still believe that this guy had psychic powers.
So, what to make of psychics? At best, they are simply deluded, though well-meaning people. At worst, they are con men, and liars. If any of them had geniune abilities, surely one case (proving their abilities) would have been known by now.
I leave it o the reader to reach his own conclusions.

See, that kind of sentiment just isn’t good enough for me.

Businesses simply are not allowed to outright LIE about their product. You can’t just claim, “I can do such-and-such”, take money for it, and then not do such-and-such.

It’s a business that preys upon the weak-minded through dishonest marketing.

There’s simply not an iota of a drop of a shred of an atom of validity to it. It’s remarkable that there are still people who think who think there is, and a testament that you can fool some of the people all of the time. It’s not up for debate.