Question about Playboy

Can you settle a bet on Playboy?

You might be offended so I will put he question in a spoiler box. Don’t read it if you are offended by sexual questions.

Has Playboy ever included a photograph that showed a woman’s asshole in the main magazine?

1 : I don’t know.

2 : The preview bubble removes the spoiler blackout. Not that I was offended; just to tell you.

I neither know nor have the resources to find out, but I suspect it would be useful to those with the time and stash if they knew whether you are counting incidental spottings or require full-on voidage.

Women have assholes? God damn it, you ruined them for me.

I would count anything were you can see the actual asshole, not just the surrounding area. That is, it can’t be covered by a thong or G-string.

No they never have. Their first ‘bush’ shot was an arsty fartsy multiple exposure of a dancer doing a scissor kick. That’s how afraid they were of putting off their audience.
It seems so tame vs what Google pops out at you when you ask for a movie star’s picture - seems they’ve all got OBGYN shots on the web.

They show more explicit shots now, right? When I “read” Playboy in the 90’s they only showed bush, never any labia.

When was the historic first labia shot? Surely this is a date in the history books, with government offices closed on that day and such.

Cool looks like I will win the bet. And my dream is still alive.

What, women or assholes?

Check out the tale of Pamela Anderson’s disappearing labia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pamela_Anderson

In 1964, Playboy did far better than display a photograph of a female asshole – it published an interview of one: http://ellensplace.net/ar_pboy.html

Doesn’t sound like the Playboy spread is much of a spread if you can’t even see labia. On the other hand with the Hustler spread you can see a woman’s kidneys.

Playboy isn’t about pornography. A old rommate of mine asked me why I had a subscription, offering that he needed “much harder” stuff for wank material. I agreed with him that Playboy is all but worthless for wanking.

Playboy it isn’t intended to be used as porn. (Though in a pinch, I suppose…)

There are no genital shots, or asshole shots. No simulated sex. No urination pictures. (shudder) There are exactly two kinds of nudie spreads: the All-American Girl Next Door, and celebrities.

The trend of being clean shaven, though, has made it more explicit.

At least she wasn’t naked.

::snerk::

to the OP
Ever is a big word so I can’t say for sure, but I doubt it. They are softcore and usually mostly show a woman’t breasts and some pubic hair.

Sorry if this is off-topic, but it didn’t seem worth starting a new thread. In the linked Wikipedia article appears this blub about Anderson’s appearance on Letterman:

Um, what does that mean? I suspect it’s an allusion to frequent masturbation or something, but I just don’t get it.

Well, they did publish a photo once of Annette Bening with Warren Beatty . …

I clicked on that wiki Pam Anderson link, and on that 2004 Playboy cover of her that it shows, one of her legs looks diseased! Does anyone know what the heck that’s about?

A woman can masturbate by grinding on the corner of a countertop.
…um, I hear.

Pretty sure it’s paint. The Playboy bunny is down on her ankle.