This is my first new thread, I hope I have it in the right place. This is kind of long, please bear with me, I need some objective opinions on this.
Last week, a friend of mine sent me (and a large group of other people in her address book) an email about George Bush’s religious beliefs. I did not respond.
The next day, two people had responded to the email, and had “replied to all” so the entire group of people got them. I sent an email to the group saying, “If you are going to continue this discussion, could you please make it private, or remove my email address from the list? Thanks, [my name].”
My friend got mad! She wrote back that her email was the whole idea of freedom of speech, and said she would make sure not to send me “emails of that nature” in the future.
I responded:
"Actually, yes, I’d prefer a personal email telling me how you’re doing every once in a while, over a forwarded email to a large group of people.
“This is my work email. I’m sorry you feel that my asking your friends to take me off the email list makes me seem rude. One forwarded email from you doesn’t bother me, but if you wanted to start a discussion about it, you should have asked everybody first if they wanted to participate. That’s standard protocol.”
She got even angrier. I won’t paste what she said here, because that’s a whole other email protocol issue. She basically denied having started the discussion, said “freedom of speech” again, and said “some people are just too sensitive.” You can probably guess the rest, from my reply, that I have NOT sent yet:
"[Name,] you are the one who is being too sensitive. I already said that I don’t care if you send me email, I just didn’t want to get involved in this particular discussion and nicely asked the GROUP of people discussing it (NOT YOU SPECIFICALLY) to remove my name. (Yes, you DID start the discussion, when you copied the email to your group of friends.) As usual, you blow my emails out of proportion. At least you didn’t bitch me out in public this time.
"I know that you prefer phone calls to keep in touch, but I haven’t gotten one of those from you in a while either. I can see why you prefer it, though; I can never seem to get anything through to you in an email and had to call you last time to “explain myself” (and you admitted that you had blown it out of proportion, remember?). Well, I’m not going to call you and try to smooth this one over, when yet again, you are the one who has been too sensitive and blown it out of proportion. If you still think I am wrong, feel free to call me. But I don’t know how I can make it any clearer than I already have.
“Please tell me what is wrong with asking to have my name removed from a discussion list. Or is it your opinion that I should be forced to read email from people I don’t know? Freedom of speech is fine, AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT INFRINGE ON THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS. A lot of people forget that part.”
Some background:
-This isn’t the first time she’s blown an email of mine out of proportion.
-I’m not the only one on that list of people she sent the email to who didn’t like receiving it, and who now agrees with me (and who agreed the last time, too).
Questions:
-Who is right?
-Did I come across as being rude in the first two emails?
-If I’m right, what do I do now? Send the third email, as is (bitchy)? Or edit it to be nicer? I’m afraid if I do that, she won’t “get it” and will still be angry. Or she will think she’s won, which I don’t want.
I don’t want to “get over it” or let it slide, either. I did that the last time she overreacted to something I said, and I won’t do it again. And I won’t call her; I’d like to use my best medium for debate (written), rather than hers (verbal).
Please help!