There’s no commercial sex exemption from child support liability just like there’s no statutory rape exception. Nevada law requires condoms for vaginal & anal intercourse, and highly doubt that any of the girls are relaying on condoms for their birth control. Pills, injections, IUDs and implants are much more reliable.
Of course they are, but they all also have a failure rate. While the odds of pregnancy while the pill & rubbers are used are astronomical, it’s still possible.
But to the first question, how big of a deal is it when the condom breaks?
Well, what can you do? If, as Alphaboi867 suggests, the purpose of the condom is mainly to impede transmission of disease, you can step up medical inspection for a time after the accident, and possibly take some further prophylactic measures. But I don’t think there’s anything useful that can be done that must be done within minutes of the accident so I’d expect that, from the customer’s point of view, no, there isn’t any perceptible “huge panic”.
Remember, child support is a debt owed the child - the custodial parent just receives it on behalf of the child. As a result, the parents cannot sign away child support requirements, unless the one parent simply never bothers to chase the the other. If she signs away the right then changes her mind, she can come after you. Also - some states will force women on welfare to disclose the identity of the parent if they are collecting welfare, and then the state will chase the father for repayment of the welfare amount.
You will see greater panic among strippers when some guy shoots his load off in his pants and it soaks through to her. Calm in front of the guy who got the lap dance and then all “Shit - who has the bleach? God damn asshole! Ah, Hell” once they get back stage. When you are working sex, its an assumed risk. When you are working the appearance of sex, that’s when some folks can go totally phobic.
Off topic but… As I recall, the laws were written with that in mind (old topic) and specifically exclude sperm donated to legally established sperm banks and used by a doctor for fertlization.
I recall a recent article where a gay fellow who did a favour for a lesbian couple (the old “turkey baster” situation) is now being sued by their state welfare department for child support. The article mentioned only doctor-performed fertilization from an accredited sperm bank were exempt. Seems one of the couple got cancer, so now they are broke and on welfare and the law was IIRC “identify the father or be denied welfare then have the child removed due to neglect - failure to provide adequate support”. So they turned him in an now he’s fighting the state.