Quick question, anyone know a cite for the murder stats in Cincinnati for 2006?

holmes · June 13, 2005, 9:31pm

I’ve been googling the best I can, but can’t find anything. The more specific the better…race, neighbourhood, reasons…etc.

thanks

friedo · June 13, 2005, 9:35pm

None so far.

Rube_E.Tewesday · June 13, 2005, 9:36pm

Are you putting “2006” into your Google, also?

Cause, you know…

jnglmassiv · June 13, 2005, 9:44pm

Cinci crime stats for 2005 ytd, 04, & 03.

Hoodoo_Ulove · June 13, 2005, 9:50pm

“Watson. have you been posting in my name again?”

panache45 · June 13, 2005, 10:10pm

Sorry, none of my balls is made of crystal.

Crandolph · June 13, 2005, 10:22pm

I think they’re planning to start at zero.

samclem · June 13, 2005, 11:39pm

If anyone can do this, it’ll be Google.

Little_Nemo · June 14, 2005, 3:59am

No problem. I have the figures at hand:

Total murders in the City of Cincinnati for 2006: 0
Total murders in the Cincinnati Metropolitan Area for 2006: 0

By race:
White: 0
Black: 0
Asian: 0
Native American: 0
Aleut/Pacific Islander: 0
Biracial/Other/Unknown: 0

By neighbourhood:
East Side: 0
West Side: 0
North Side: 0
South Side: 0
Downtown: 0

By reason:
Argument got out of hand: 0
Drug related crime: 0
Gang related crime: 0
Boredom related crime: 0
Gun went off during cleaning: 0
Knife went off during cleaning: 0
Nothing personal, just business: 0
Shot just to watch die: 0
Dead men tell no tales: 0
Needed killing: 0
Killing not mandatory but recommended: 0
Serial killing (Original): 0
Serial killing (Copycat): 0
Mad science experiment: 0
Mercy killing: 0
Pity killing: 0
Human sacrifice: 0
Civil War re-enactment gone awry: 0

tofergregg · June 14, 2005, 5:29am

I’d be willing to bet that the first thing Google charges for will be GFuture. That’s gonna piss me off, because I already know I won’t be able to afford it.

-Tofer

holmes · June 14, 2005, 12:41pm

Crap…now a great search engine would’ve asked me did meant 2005…hasn’t happened yet.

and I wouldn’t cursed it, for trying to read my mind. heh.

thanks guys.

Fromage_A_Trois · June 14, 2005, 1:05pm

Har Har Har Har Har Har

That’s cheered me up, thanks!

Arwin · June 14, 2005, 2:44pm

I’m gonna add that from the looks of it you won’t be needing it neither.

Crandolph · June 14, 2005, 7:34pm

This is all reminding me that in working on a huge demographic database in time series around a decade ago I found a lot of reported East German zeros for a number of years for suicide, homocide, and car accidents. This in a population of 17 million people! :dubious:

If you’re going to lie, at least make it realistic.

Happy_Scrappy_Hero_Pup · June 15, 2005, 12:35pm

Doesn’t China insist that it has no homosexuals and no cases of HIV/AIDS?
And I bet the Phelpsians are kicking themselves over the fact that the godless commies are getting it done and they ain’t.

Padeye · June 15, 2005, 12:56pm

Timecop, he might know.

GorillaMan · June 15, 2005, 1:04pm

Actually, a time-travel prototype killed three bystanders. The trial’s set for Feb '07.

Otto · June 15, 2005, 2:53pm

China admits it has homosexuals and it does acknowledge that it has AIDS cases.

Little_Nemo · June 15, 2005, 4:26pm

Like back in the nineties, when Saddam Hussein ran for re-election and it was reported that approximately 99.95% of Iraqis voted for him. Obviously, he wanted the other .05% to be there so the election wouldn’t look like it was fixed.

Steve_MB · June 15, 2005, 5:08pm

This shows the significance of the Opposition:

Ambrose Bierce:

OPPOSITION, n. In politics the party that prevents the Government from running amuck by hamstringing it.

The King of Ghargaroo, who had been abroad to study the science of government, appointed one hundred of his fattest subjects as members of a parliament to make laws for the collection of revenue. Forty of these he named the Party of Opposition and had his Prime Minister carefully instruct them in their duty of opposing every royal measure. Nevertheless, the first one that was submitted passed unanimously. Greatly displeased, the King vetoed it, informing the Opposition that if they did that again they would pay for their obstinacy with their heads. The entire forty promptly disemboweled themselves.

“What shall we do now?” the King asked. “Liberal institutions cannot be maintained without a party of Opposition.”

“Splendor of the universe,” replied the Prime Minister, “it is true these dogs of darkness have no longer their credentials, but all is not lost. Leave the matter to this worm of the dust.”

So the Minister had the bodies of his Majesty’s Opposition embalmed and stuffed with straw, put back into the seats of power and nailed there. Forty votes were recorded against every bill and the nation prospered. But one day a bill imposing a tax on warts was defeated – the members of the Government party had not been nailed to their seats! This so enraged the King that the Prime Minister was put to death, the parliament was dissolved with a battery of artillery, and government of the people, by the people, for the people perished from Ghargaroo.