Regarding this thread, may I humbly suggest you step back for a moment, and take a deep breath? Then perhaps listen to me for a moment?
The OP asked for language that distinguish between two different kinds of “hot”. I suggested one, Spanish, and mentioned in passing that I disagreed with the OP’s premise that English didn’t distinguish between the two concepts. Then aaslatten posted, wondering why English speakers still said “spicy hot” and “temperature hot”, given the breadth of English vocabulary. I replied then replied to aaslatten’s post.
My reply was a bit flippant. But still, I feel it was relevant to the OP. It was a reply to aaslatten, and related to my contention that English does distinguish between the two types of “hot-ness”.
Then you came in, so to speak. You made a very informative post, but you started by suggesting that I didn’t know what the word “scalding” meant.
I quite frankly was rather puzzled by that. Just to be sure, I looked it up. I also mentioned the derivation of the word, not to “impress ancient Romans” but because it was related to what I had said earlier about Latin-derived languages having similar words.
Then, apparently, you blew a gasket. Quite frankly, this:
and this:
were both condescending and insulting. I don’t think your comments were warranted, and I don’t think I deserved that level of hostility. I have, in fact, been known to cook (although I freely admit I’m not that experienced at it) and I have even been known to bake bread, and I did answer the OP thank you very bloody much.
If you thought I was being too flippant or not on-topic enough, you might have considered just saying so. Instead, you decided to fire with both barrels. Next time, try cooling your jets and using some civility.
(I’ve made nearly 20 posts in threads related to the election this week, and this is what prompts me to pit a Doper for the first time. Weird week, I guess.)