It should be noted that Rushton, whom NDD apparantly worships, was disciplined at his university for harassing people at a nearby mall asking them such classy questions as “how big is your penis when erect”, “how many sexual partners do you have”, and “how far do you ejaculate”?
In short, he’s a crank whom no one, except apparantly NDD takes seriously.
Well, they’re relevant to IQ because his central thesis is that racial groups use evolutionary strategies that trade off sexual prowess (mostly in the form of penis size) with intelligence. Supposedly, blacks are oversexed and dumb, asians are undersexed and smart, and whites are a happy medium.
How else is he going to verify his theory if he can’t go down to the mall and ask people about their penis size? Hmmmm?
[QUOTE=Ibn Warraq]
It should be noted that Rushton, whom NDD apparantly worships, was disciplined at his university for harassing people at a nearby mall asking them such classy questions as “how big is your penis when erect”, “how many sexual partners do you have”, and “how far do you ejaculate”?
[/QUOTE]
(emphasis mine)
Who the hell knows this ?!
The previous two are somewhat valid anthropological questions and, well, a researcher can expect most people to be at least dimly aware of the number of people they’ve been fucking over the last few days/months/years ; I would also assume most guys in the Western world have anxiously grasped a tape measure at some point in their teenage years if only out of peer pressure / body image complexes… But who the hell measures how far their splooge goes ? And WHY ?
How was he exposed? What has he said that is not true? The failure of No Child Left Behind to eliminate, or even reduce the race gap in academic achievement provides fresh evidence for what he and Charles Murray have written.
Rushton first came out with this sort of thing during his tenure at Western University in the 1990s, most notable in “Race, Evolution, and Behaviour,” his 1995 book. The book’s claims were torn to shreds by actual science in subsequent years, though he found allies in the Canadian white supremacist scene. He’s an obsessive racist, and everything he’s published on the subject has been systematically discredited through the scientific method within a few years of it hitting bookshelves, but he makes moeny off it from people like you, so he keeps writing it.
Well, for one thing he has made the false claim in various talks that the UN, when selecting condoms for distribution to the third world, picked three sizes and ordered the smallest sent to Asia, the middle sized ones sent to “white” regions, and the largest ones sent to Africa. The only problem with his lie is that the UN only specified two sizes and did not actually set any region to receive any particular size. He made it up to promote his Black>White>Asian sex claims.
Well, I was aiming for one of his outright lies, but I am certainly willing to dismiss him just on the basis that he has not made a serious contribution to science in years and years.