Eh, I’m gonna cut Rachel some slack here. If we’re being honest with ourselves, I’m sure most of us have been so exasperated by our relatives to the point of having inappropriate thoughts that we wouldn’t ever say out loud. Much healthier to dump such thoughts anonymously into cyberspace than let them slip out in real life and then regret it. In fact, right in her OP she came right out and said she was venting and whining, and then people were taken aback when she did just that. Okay, whatever.
It’s my understanding that Rach has had to deal with some serious shit in her life (and I’m not talking about crotch stink) and has earned her edgy attitude. Even if she comes off a bit harsh at times, she’s not hurting anybody here and usually has something relevant to say when she participates in a thread. I think I get where she’s coming from and I actually kind of like her style.
Well she wasn’t 100% blind and he wasn’t 100% deaf. She had macular degeneration, and was excellent at faking it (it was obvious that her vision was much worse than she claimed). He wore hearing aids, but they often weren’t turned on (my grandmother was never sure how much he couldn’t hear, and how much he just pretended not to hear). My grandmother considered him to be extremely romantic, and sometimes compared him unfavorably to my grandfather in that respect, to the extreme disapproval of my mother. He drew pictures of her and wrote her poetry. I believe they married when she was 76 and he was 80, although there were some rumors that for benefits purposes they were never actually legally married. My grandmother did use his last name during the time they were together. I believe their relationship lasted about 8 years, until his death. After that my grandmother told me that she was not going to marry again, because all the men just wanted someone to cook and clean for them. She did continue to date, and at age 88 told me the saga of how both David and Irving wanted to take her to the New Year’s Eve party at the Senior Center.
She died at 94. After her death, we found some great old pictures of her, including bathing suit shots and one from the 1920’s in which she was wearing knickers and argyle socks and sitting on the back of some guy’s motorcycle.
This. Literally every single time I’d read a post and think to myself, “Goddamn, this person is a fucking idiot,” it would be her. Without fail. Any time a post would inspire me to shake my head and wonder wtf, it would always be her. And when I realized all of my responses to her were chastising her stupidity, I realized I needed to just ignore her.
She is truly the only person, in all my years on the Doper, that has made me feel that way. Which is kind of impressive, when you really think about it.
Me too. I don’t often start by reading poster names, but most likely, when someone is just a judgmental idiot, I glance up and see her name.
She’s clearly dealing with some major issues re: social skills, weight, maybe a bad past, etc. But her judgmental nature mixed with her incessant whining and the thought of her questionable hygiene skills, just aakkkkkghghhhhh…
I can never forget the landlord thread with the accusations of homophobia against the landlord, and then the stinky bed thread, combined with her self-described lifestyle of 24/7 WoW in various places.
She’s a total complete bitch, pretty much all the time, so far as i can tell…
Sure, but how much polyester pants wearing experience do you have? I’ve got…none. Maybe it’s a fabric that cultivates stink. Some people have made similar complains about a particular type of moisture-wicking material that the name of currently escapes me.
As for the OP, I agree with the person in the thread with “let me get this straight” post that she should totally avoid trying to give financial advice. Unless it’s to serve as an object lesson.
Okay, it’s not exactly hypocrisy that I’m calling her out on. More like, she herself might not be so stressed if she would chill out and stop nickel-and-diming. She seems as unreasonable IRL as she is here, and I thought the first two replies in this thread were spot on. rachel suggested taking it to the Pit, and I figured why not.
Ok - I think that’s a perfectly fair point to make. I thought you were going for the “turnabout’s fair play” angle in the OP, and I just didn’t really see the turnabout there - my bad.
I agree that she is often (ok, usually) abrasive - but I’ve seen many posters who are worse than she is, much more often, and I didn’t feel her linked posts were too out of line.
as far as i can tell rachel is a relatively unpopular poster around here, so it’s probably safe enough. heaven forbid one actually express an opinion beyond a one line agreement against, or for, or maybe against again because i overreacted, the pit topic du jour.
Her unpopularity has little to do with her tendency to give brash advice while having a more than shitty life, it’s how a few threads she started have left an unremovable stain on most posters’ psyche. I remember something about a banana that still leaves me trembling at night.
