Radio idiot

NPR story so I don’t have a cite.

I was driving around noon CST and listening to ‘Day to Day’ on NPR. One of NPR’s reporters was on one of the hurricane-chasing planes.

Typical questions. Typical answers. Then the stupidity happens.

Anchor: As people, we have a tendency to give these monstrous storms an animalistic aspect. Is there any sort of will or intent behind these hurricanes?

Reporter: Umm…no. That’s the stuff of science fiction.
I mean, come the fuck on. Are you telling me that you honestly thought there was some sort of brain in there thinking Gulfport? Nah. Nawlens? Maybe. Galveston? Hmmm…Wait, no, Nawlens again. HHAHAHAAHAHAHA! I’m an eeeeeeeevil storm. Look at me, mom! I’m taking these fuckers out! Woooo!

Hey dipshit, you do realize that you’re on national news, right?

And this is the smarty librul intellectual radio.

Sigh.

-Joe

“Day To Day” is on the B-list of NPR shows. That’s why the station where I work doesn’t carry it. You’re bound to hear stuff like that on it. The guy is on national radio in selected markets where they can’t afford “Talk Of The Nation” or another, better show.

My local market just started doing Talk of the Nation - from 1pm-3pm, I believe. Day to Day is on right before it.

Not everything needs to be great…but let’s avoid demonstrating total idiocy unless absolutely necessary.

-Joe

KQED (San Francisco) has the largest audience of any NPR affiliate. They had Day to Day on for a while when it first started. But not for very long.

Well, at least the answer to the stupid question was correct.

Guy may be angling for an anchor job on FOX:

Anchor: Yes, all the available data indicates that this is an evil liberal environmentalist hurricane that is attacking us with the specific goals of making global warming more credible, making the President look bad, and making us want to reclaim the swamps south of New Orleans. Katrina: what a BITCH!

Snappy, no less.

See the big, sexually-suggestive eye in the center of the hurricane?

Its obviously a lesbian storm!

This past week, I had to get up earlier than usual for work and was dismayed to find that 940 News, which I normally listen to in the shower for traffic, weather and headlines, picks up the feed from some truly bizarre Jesus-loving conspiracy-believing overnight show from (I gather) South Dipshit, Arizona. I happened to tune in at a moment when the host was speaking seriously about SETI wavelengths and thought “Hmmm, this is pretty advanced for a radio science show”, but then he started taking calls from people who spoke earnestly of, among other topics, the “Cereans” (not Syrians, as I initially and bemusedly assumed) bombarding our atmosphere with water to offset the greenhouse effect and we’d better take heed before it’s too late, and so forth.

I wouldn’t be so quick on the trigger. “Will or intent behind these hurricanes” may not have been in reference to the storms themselves but rather our own Goverment. There are a bunch of crackpots out there who think we have the capability to control the weather.

[Devil’s Advocate]Not having heard the show, perhaps the questioner was trying to dispel ignorance that may have been in his audience. Something more along the lines of a “Some idiots believe these things are a malevolent force. Please dispel their ignorance” type of question.[/Devil’s Advocate]

if he doesn’t ask the hard-hitting questions, who will?

Is that why everyone’s worried about water coming over the dike?

:smiley:

Man, I sure wish I’d heard that and been able to call in! I’ve been wondering for a few weeks now why we can’t just shoot an ICBM into the storm to get it to dissipate somewhat.
What, not possible? Why yes, I did have the Natural Science class taught by the wrestling coach, why do you ask?

That would tend to be my interpretation, as well. That’s a leading question, with a predictable answer. They asked it because they knew what the answer would be.

Geez, even on CNN today, the weather babe was talking about projected course of the storm in terms of “What Rita decides to do.”

Are pathetic fallacies that hard to avoid?

That’s also how I interpreted it. It seems very likely to me that the anchor had heard other people (even other news-people) anthropomorphizing the storm, and he was wanting to put that idea to rest. However, the anchor’s not allowed to say, “Of course, any fool knows that storms can’t think.” So he did the only thing he IS allowed to do: he asked the reporter, “So, can storms think?” allowing the reporter to say what he wanted to say.

Daniel

I thought this thread was going to be about This Guy who apparently

.
To be fair, he is from Idaho. Hey, at least I’m not slurring Mexicans.

. :dubious:
Oh yeah!

If we did…we’d be using it.

“North Korea, you’re on a peninsula, right? Oceans on both sides if I recall correctly. That’s a pretty vulnerable spot. I’m not threatening you or anything, I’m just saying…”

-Joe

Pshaw–as if our government isn’t in the hands of Red China already! Why would our secret masters want to risk bad weather near their shores? Why, I heard the other day that Peking has been experiencing a lovely summer. What more proof do you need?

Daniel