Rantings about stupid nuclear reporting, and I want to bitchslap somebody, also other crap

Oh gosh mister, I guess I’m just sort of slow. I thought he was serious.

I’m alleging that you are a troll who makes inflammatory statements and will not back them up.

You can easily prove me wrong by providing the cite. But I’m not wrong.

Regards,
Shodan

Now see, that’s the sort of sheer nonsense that makes me think YOU are trollin. I know you must be serious, but it’s hard to imagine this is so.

It’s loltastic

Oh jeez, not the ‘cite’ thing again. “Cite” is a verb. It is a fucking VERB not a noun. Learn to speak correctly and quit falling prey to the internet lingo them kids use.

Cite is a noun as well as a verb.
You can get back to citing articles in Japanese now if you’d like.

cite
verb /sīt/ 
cited, past participle; cited, past tense; cites, 3rd person singular present; citing, present participle

noun /sīt/ 
cites, plural

A citation
So, and this will come as a surprise to many people following this thread, you appear to be misinformed on that.

But, if it will make you happier: Please produce a reliable citation for the number of people who died as a result of radiation in the recent events in Japan.

One thing I would like to say. Truly, the way this thread has brought together people of different race, creed, nationality, faith and politics, all to share one common sentiment…well, it’s a beautiful thing.

Even if that single sentiment is “FXMastermind, you’re full of shit”

Citer is a noun.

But when used as “to cite, to quote” it is a verb.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/citar

But by all means, lets focus on this rather than a nuclear disaster.

Haha

Didn’t realize the idiots would have posted four times before I responded.

Excellent.

Meanwhile, the readings on radioiodine are troubling.

By now there should be almost no radioiodine left.

That still just kills. Not only do you not understand many things, you don’t even know they are happening.

This is because you simply don’t follow a real science based thread on the ongoing disaster. Every day.

If you were, you might have a clue.

You have no idea what this means
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-fukushima/20110819/0820_shinosenmap.html

much less where to view the Google map, or the videos.

Going back to this point, which of course nobody understood at the time, finding short lived radioisotopes weeks or months after the reactors are no longer reacting is bad news.

New findings of short lived isotopes is making it look like the early results were spot on, and in at least two locations there is an ongoing nuclear reaction at Fukushima.

This also fits with the neutron readings and blue flashes measured from reactor 3

FXMastermind, a verbal Juggernaut. :dubious:

Learn to cope

I love how FX quotes a post that was made a short while after the incident, and uses that to somehow assert that I have the same opinion on a different phenomenon multiple months later.

He strikes me as more of a verbal Juggalo.

fucking radiation, how does it work

To know me is to love me.

I don’t know you.

Your loss. Your loss.

Please provide a reliable cite of the number of people killed by radiation in the recent events in Japan.

Regards,
Shodan

I would guess that you know most people subjected to excessive radiation die in the future due to cellular mangling. They get cancer later in life. In almost all cases it takes some time.
In this event, there are some badly over radiated people. They are in serious jeopardy.
If you are suggesting that being subjected to radiation only matters if you die face down in a fleshy blob, you don’t understand how radiation affects the body, or you are being a jerk.
Japanese Nuclear Plant Workers Say Radiation Death Is Inevitable - Gothamist Ask these guys.