In another thread, people are arguing that forcing others to have trans-vaginal ultrasounds in order to receive abortions isn’t rape. I think this is bullshit.
First, these trans-vaginal ultrasounds are unnecessary, and serve no medical purpose. Often, the doctor is forced to outright lie to the patient by the republican lawmakers who pass these dumb laws. These laws have the goal of humiliating women and trying to ‘trick’ them into not getting an abortion by lying to them, or through shame. They are designed to exert power over others.
The first argument made was “it’s not really violent rape, so you can’t call it rape”. This “not a legitimate rape” bs I’ll dismiss out of hand. Not all rapes are violent.
The argument that keeps being made is - “no woman is being FORCED to do this”. This is extremely dangerous of an argument to make, and is not true. If a person wants an abortion, under this law, they are forced to do it. Pregnencies CAN be life threatening, or carry risk of medical complications or death. In my mind, forcing a person to be vaginally probed (unnecessarily, for no medical reason) in order to avoid medical complications or death is no different from physically threatening them to coerce them.
I would suggest that this something that is totally unproductive to argue about. Rape is a legal term of art; something that’s codified as not only not illegal, but required by law, is by definition not rape. What you’re really arguing is “this is tantamount to rape,” while the people you’re arguing with are saying “it’s awful and invasive but not literally rape.”
You aren’t even disagreeing, except in the absoluteness of your language.
:rolleyes: So if some dictatorship goes to the trouble of doing the paperwork before handing off female slaves to its soldiers as “comfort women”, it’s not rape when the soldiers force themselves on the slaves?
Another idiotic comparison. A legal and medically legitimate gynecological procedure, even if medically unnecessary in a certain situation where it’s legally mandated for purposes of political obstructionism and oppression, is simply not on the same footing as a tyranny giving certain subjects carte blanche to commit actual rape.
Man, I haven’t heard this kind of intemperate and hysterical silliness since some of the old-timer board libertarians used to fume that taxation was theft and speed-limit laws were slavery.
Folks, mandatory vaginal ultrasound laws are bad enough on their own merits to justify strenuously opposing them on those grounds alone. By all means, go ahead and Pit the hell out of such outrageous abuses of our healthcare and legal systems.
But we don’t have to pretend that such procedures are literally the same as rape in order to be against them. As I said, that gross distortion of the facts is an insulting trivialization of the suffering of anyone who’s ever experienced actual rape.
Quit this exaggerated and melodramatic shit-stirring. You’re not being pro-woman, you’re just being anti-Republican.
The only idiots are the people who think there’s nothing wrong with saying “it’s not rape if it’s legal!”. Keep in mind women could be raped by their husbands and the law didn’t care until very recently. I still consider that rape.
I think that the procedure where a woman is forced into an unnecessary medical procedure and is lied to in an attempt to humiliate her and make her feel guilt is traumatizing, based on the word of others. I do not know how traumatizing it is in particular. I do think being lectured about how you’re an awful, awful baby killer by someone who’s supposed to be helping you can be traumatizing, and I take the word of those who have FELT these things on it.
What the fuck is with you people screaming about them having to be equal? “It wasn’t equally traumatizing as a violent rape, so it wasn’t rape”, and now this, which is missing the point by a fucking mile.
The question basically was - as long as it’s legal, do you think it can never be rape? Because there have been LOTS of “legal rapes” throughout history. So trying to hide behind “Oh, it’s legal” and then running and screaming about false comparisons is simply stupid.
Oh, for Christ’s sake. Nobody’s saying “it’s not rape if it’s legal!” What we’re saying is “it’s not rape if it’s consensual”. Because it isn’t.
I completely agree with you, which is one reason I’m adamantly opposed to laws requiring unnecessary vaginal ultrasounds as a prerequisite to abortion.
But something can be bad, wrong, oppressive, invasive, and traumatizing AND STILL NOT BE ACTUAL RAPE.
And the answer is that legality in and of itself is not the issue here, as you should have realized if you were actually paying attention to the discussion.
The point is that if it’s legal and consensual, it cannot be rape. Doesn’t mean it can’t still be bad and wrong and oppressive and unfair. But words mean something, and the word “rape” means that the rape victim has not consented to the act. Consequently, a medical procedure that a patient legally and knowingly consents to cannot be rape.
You really are tilting at windmills here, Karrius. Everybody knows you still consider it rape. You keep saying it. The distinction is that you’re acting like you’re saying “this actually is literal rape” when what you mean is “this is bad for the same reasons rape is bad.”
Rape is invasive and traumatizing and is a bad thing, and we’re against it. Mandatory ultrasounds are invasive and I presume can be traumatizing and they’re bad and I’m against them. But they aren’t rape. You’re the one who is creating the equivalence you’re complaining about - nobody else has said it isn’t bad enough if it isn’t rape.
Depends where you are. Most places, if it’s literal blackmail, no. In my jurisdiction it’s only rape if the threat is of force, not embarrassment or monetary loss or whatever.