And thank God for people like Razorsharp to protect us from the evil liberal conspiracy to destroy freedom, democracy and America as it could be if only those nasty liberal types would stop their meddling. Let’s see what else our fearless defender of the faith has to say:
“So who are these liberals,” I hear you ask, “and how can I identify them and thus uncover their nefarious scheme for world domination?”
Well fear no more, citizen, for here in easy-to-read form are some of the key attribute of liberals and their befuddled and corrupt thinking, as set out by Razorsharp in this thread here. I’m sure he won’t mind me taking a few of his views about liberals out of context and using them to point out the danger that Western civilization is in from this dastardly scourge; indeed, it’s a moral imperative that I do so. (And remember, folks, these are all from only one thread! Just imagine what other pearls of wisdom we could find with just a little searching!)
Speak it, brother! How dare they promote promiscuity in poor people!
Right: liberals are working towards the subversion of the white race – got it.
How so, O Speaker of Truth?
But is it just liberals we should worry about?
Okay, so liberals, in league with neoconservatives, are in favor of diversity, fascism, and female genital mutilation. Check.
Anything else?
These liberals sound like fearsome folk. I hope I never encounter one.
I’m pretty sure this clown isn’t interesting enough to be pitted, but I’ll point that he seems to think he’s found a magic formula to get around the “no insult” rule in GD: name a group, heap all variety of insults on that group, then suggest that posters who disagree with you are members of that group. As a result, he can pile oodles and oodles of scorn of “liberals”, imply that other posters are “liberals”, and avoid getting banned for insulting the posters.
It falls apart, though, when the other posters fail to become defensive or recognize that they are members of the group described, or at least not the wildly exaggerated and caricatured version described.
originally posted by Razorsharp :
"The orthodoxy of liberalism is really comical. For instance, in the realm of religion, or rather, anti-religion, there is no creation, we evolved.
But, when pointing out differences between the races, groups, sub-species or whatever “invented” category, that can be attributed to evolution, liberals start wailing and stomping their feet, demanding that “we’re all the same.”
I’d just like to go ahead take offense to this as a fence-sitting atheist. Evolution is not orthodox dogma and there is no secret cabal of liberal scientists out to disprove the great and magical father in the sky. We don’t care, except “goddidit” just isn’t good science. Oh, and I won’t even stomp my feet and try to explain to you how members of the same species may differ phenotypically, and(through the various processes of evolution, mind you) remain genotypically very similar.
And why not? It’s a tactic that worked for a long, long time for another right-wing Doper, before he eventually crossed the line.
BTW, if anyone feels that I may be misrepresenting Razorsharp’s position here either through selective quoting or misleading juxtaposition of statements, I positively encourage you to visit the inked thread and read them in their original context.
I find Razorsharp’s “obsession” with categorizing “liberals”, as some absurdly broad and monolithic group that “moves as one” toward a common goal of, er, well, what is the goal exactly, completely “bizarre”.
This guy’s “crazier than a sack of squirrels”, but for some reason, what really gets “up my snout” with him is his constant, seemingly random use of “quotation marks”. What in the name of Karl, Chico and Zeppo Marx is the purpose of putting “hate-crime”, “talk radio”, “D.C. sniping” and “expert”, among other phrases, in quotes?
So very sorry to be “wailing and stomping my feet” about “this” triviality.
To denigrate them without actually having to think of something wrong with them. It also serves to make one’s adversary think that one is denigrating that thing, and when such a point is raised, the original poster can then claim “Well I didn’t mean to, but if you think I was then it obviously speaks to your liberal bias…” etc.
Because the only way to fight ignorance is to read what it orders its monkeys to type randomly.
Surely … you didn’t think Razorsharp’s posts are meaningful or coherent, did you? Oh, no, dear sir. Not meant to be taken seriously at all. Razorsharp is like the bastard child of Justhink and … oh, so many looney wingnuts from whom to choose. I’d go with Serlin, but Razordull has yet to rant about fat women or poofy hair.
I participated a little in that thread, but I found that Bryan Ekers and tomndebb kept making points I was going to make before I could commit them to electrons. It’s rather amusing to watch Razorsharp’s contortions as he attempts to defend his position, especially because he imagines he is doing a good job.
But since this is The BBQ Pit[sub]tm[/sub], allow me to list some things Razorsharp is actually as sharp as:
a down pillow
Jupiter
anything built by Pierson’s Puppeteers
air
water
a child’s scissors
a tire
graphite
AOL customer service
a Frisbee
a lump of clay