People have ideologies around being close to God and going to heaven, I’ve actually questioned these people extensively… who by the way also agree assholes get the most sex… they say that the reason they are not suicidal is because they are filled with the warmth of the holy spirit and believe Gods plan for them is peace in heaven for accepting extremely high stratification of sexual variety on the male side. I’ve met over 10 people who have this position.
Like what? Be specific; name the actions (not vague “patterns”) that you used. And please, be concise.
Actually the pick up line is that men commit suicide because of the high stratification of sexual variety on the male side. I never indicate my own suicidality. I only say this on the off chance I’m approached by a woman and if she actually asks me what I’m thinking about.
This is patently absurd.
Who told you that men approaching and flirting with women = sexual harassment?
Your argument about the cause of suicide rates among men and woman falls apart not just because you have no valid data to support your argument but because you show a complete lack of understanding of inter-gender human social relations.
Sexual pairing (straight or gay) is a human trait. It’s biological. It’s genetic. But there is no law that says everyone is going to be successful at it or that it’s owed to every living person.
Your lack of any success at the mating ritual and pairing with the opposite sex doesn’t mean that everyone else is broken and psychotic. It only indicated that you appear to be an outlier with a mutation that is self correcting.
How you doin’?!
:smack:
Who told you that your earlier approaches were “sexual harassment?” Was it a judge?
Well… a basic one is standing or sitting next to a woman when you have the opportunity to stand sit closer to a man or in a neutral position. This is sexual harassment, this is approach. It’s about honesty… don’t be a fucking dickhead, everyone knows men like to be approached more than women do, don’t play little games in your head and then try to justify them as what women actually what when the facts don’t support it. You can also raise your voice loudly when it’s inappropriate, those are a couple… often women follow a code that who makes the most noise that doesn’t actually cause more peace draws sexual arousal. You can modify the tail-pipe of a motorcycle, or pick a sport, a team and a player and just yell that this player is the man (it doesn’t have any ethical impact whether new jersey beats san deigo… it’s a competition of aggression for pointlessness against pointlessness - which draws females in, even though they either complain about it or are not as passionate about it - actually, the only reason men are so passionate about something as ruthlessly aggressive and pointless about sports is because of women) you can blast your stereo… there are lots of things you can do to hit on women in this world that are sexual harassment.
No, those are noise pollution and creating a public nuisance.
Do you have a copy of this “woman’s code” which we can use as a reference instead of your just-so stories?
(If your previous technique can be summarized as “Making a racket makes her horney” then I can understand why you are now so bitter.)
No it’s not. Who (apart from you) thinks this is true?
You need to hang around in better bars.
Were you raised by a single mother? Was she very strict in your upbringing? Were you frequently and harshly punished? Did she dislike/mistrust men? Who taught you think this way about gender roles?
It is because men like to be hit on more than women do… every study on earth that looks into this proves it. You can look at it two ways… hitting on women causes sexual harassment to escalate because everyone knows this is true, if the gender that least likes to be hit on only accepts people who hit on them… which means that men who don’t hit on women are preventing sexual harassment. And two, since men like to be hit on more than women, it is appropriate to let the women hit on the men… it also decreases male suicide.
So it helps on two fronts… the problem with men who have consciences, is that they would kill themselves for hitting on a woman, because they would knowingly be causing sexual harassment and stealing sex from the nice guys… they’d be increasing the sexual harassment on women and killing the nicest men on earth. People who have consciences cannot live with these two consequences for approaching a woman.
Hence… female sexual blackmail creates male psychopathy… psychopaths are creating psychopaths… and the nice guys are committing suicide because of a planet of 7 billion psychopaths. Non-psychopaths don’t live with psychopaths on a scale that vast. It forces their suicides.
Assuming this is true, it’s a statement of imbalance of values, not a boolean condition.
You seem awfully eager to extrapolate any kind of statistical difference or discrepancy between men and women into an absolute, black-and-white conclusion.
That’s why you’re losing this argument all the time. People only need look around them to find counterexamples that you appear to be claiming are impossible.
I have never found a counter-example to the stratification of sexual variety, even if there are rare counter-examples of a woman approaching a man for not hitting on her… there are no counter-examples.
The female sexual blackmail system has multiple layers… which is that the only way to solve this problem is for women to be polysexual… but since women stratify sexual variety on men so severely… men don’t get rewarded for polysexuality, particularly if they are nice men.
There are no counter-examples.
because its crap you made up - its not real -
I think he’s saying that he wishes there were more slutty women than there are so men like him would have an easier time getting laid and he would not have to feel bad because, Hey, she came on to him!
well, as long as he sits quietly in a corner and never approaches,talks, looks in the general direction of, or winks at a woman or women - even the sluttiest of slutties will ignore him - they will assume, rightfully so, that he is not interested in interacting with them.
THis is a him thing - not a her thing.
Actually… everything I said is a fact.
There is high stratification for sexual variety on the male side and low sexual stratification for women on the female side… meaning that a very small percentage of men receive almost all of the sexual variety in this species, and women, from that very small percentage of men receive all the sexual variety they want.
This is a fact, this is not a myth.
The nice guy code is a fact… all nice guys observe this code, and nice guys don’t get sex.
At a very minimum, a non-expert will say to women that nice guys get laid less than more brutish men, jerks as they call them, and women will tag these men as surrogate gay best friends to set an example to the rest of the men that you cannot point out the female denial system without severe consequences.
This is what causes the suicide… and you all have been sexually, emotionally and socially blackmailed by the women.
Everything I’m telling you is a fact.
Yes. Well, it’s certainly much clearer now. Thank you.
none of those things are fact -
First off - define “nice guy” - what is this “code” ? where is it stored?