This thread is in response to Cecil’s column, Why do car makers come up with so many meaningless car names?
I’ve been asking myself this question ever since I encountered the Oldsmobile “Alero.”
Totally. Meaningless.
What kind of person looks at his company’s new car and decides that it should have a totally meaningless name based on some sort of “appeal” survey?
IMHO (and this piece may end up there), car names should evoke an image based on a real word, or at the very least, should make your vehicle sound like some kind of experimental fighter plane.
Think about it:
Dodge Viper
Chevrolet Corvette
Ford Mustang
Shelby Cobra
Words that actually mean something are so powerful! This leads me to another thing: why are some names not indicative of the vehicle, especially with respect to others?
Perfect example: the Ford SUV’s - Excursion, Expedition, and Explorer.
How are you supposed to know, based on the name, which one is the largest? The Excursion, a hulking armoured behemoth that can carry an entire soccer team, is the largest; yet the word “excursion” implies a simple day trip down to the bank of the local creek/stream/brook for a picnic.
“Expedition,” OTOH, brings to mind the voyages of Columbus, Lewis and Clark, and La Salle. You’d need a large, rugged vehicle for carrying enough provisions for your voyage - yet the Excursion is larger!
It would make more sense to name vehicles in accordance with size and power… say for example, the Ford Minnow, the Ford Dolphin, and the Ford Whale. That way, you’d know which was the largest and could plan your purchase accordingly.
It might actually make you question buying a Dodge Avenger!