It’s clearly negative to both, but moreso to Pubbies.
It’s also extremely poorly written. The author fails on the basic notion that your writing should clearly state your ideas.
I feel so used.
Other: disingenuous poll. I normally don’t respond to these, but this kind of seems to be the point, so what the hell.
Did you read the whole thread? This one is as surreal as Donald Trump suing Miss Pennsylvania.
That’s the question you should’ve put in the poll. (well, the whole poll idea was dumb in any case, but if you had to open one, that question would’ve at least been an honest attempt to address the argument). Instead you asked a question that wasn’t debatable so that everyone would agree with you, despite the fact that the question was irrelevant to the actual argument.
Uh… It means Pubbies have no sleeves?
Whups! Poor example. I’m only referring to the level of surreality. No equivalence with the main characters.
Pubbies rhymes with chubbies. That is all.
Where did Napoleon keep his pubbies?
In his sleevies!
This is a fair criticism, the poll was about the overall tone of the post, the claim was about whether the post included a condemnation of the democrats.
I think it’s a bit different. I don’t read this as suggesting the Democrats did anything wrong at all. If you believe they did something wrong, then you believe there was a right course of action that they didn’t choose.
Here are some quotes that I think are justifying the Dems course of action
The Reps refused to accept the facts and forced the Dems to commit a partisan act. That act is legitimate because it manifests the will of the people. The Reps could have avoided the outcome, but fought in order to force the Dems to be partisan.
I don’t see much room here for the Dems to make different choice that elucidator would have considered “right”.
I have a #2 pencil mark on my screen now. 
