Jeez, from that photo, Putin is trying to rival Donnie ''red tie" Trump for longest necktie.
Here’s a hint, gentlemen: you tie your tie in such a way that the pointed tip sits just above your belt. If, in doing so, the other half of your tie is longer, you tuck it into your shirt.
If he had any ethics whatsoever he would’t be doing what he’s doing. Like his orange hero, Carlson hopes to at least legally tread on the right side of the line between free speech and outright subversion. He obviously doesn’t give a shit about anything except himself, and figures that better people than he could ever be will continue to make the world a livable place while he profits from notoriety.
Late to the game, and a lot of this has been already said, but if we assume that a second Trump term comes with Republican control of both houses of Congress (which would seem likely), I feel pretty safe in predicting the following:
A Federal ban on abortions (maybe there would be exceptions for rape and incest, but I’m not betting on that).
Huge numbers of Federalist Society (or worse)-approved judges at all Federal levels. And I’m thinking Eileen Cannon-style judges, not even Amy Coney Barrett-level of competence and seriousness.
An attempt to withdraw from NATO. Congress passed legislation that states that the President cannot unilaterally withdraw, but I would expect Trump to try it anyway and then take it to SCOTUS (since the Constitution is silent on the process for withdrawing from treaties), or a compliant Congress repeals the legislation. At the very least, Europe will know not to count on US military support in that theater.
Weaponization of Federal law enforcement agencies against political rivals and journalists (and anyone else Trump has personal animus toward).
Impeachment attempts against Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Yes, I know the Republicans were’t on board for an impeachment after the President left office, but that was when it was Trump. They have zero concern for demonstrations of blatant hypocrisy on their part. It won’t be successful, since they won’t have 3/4 of the Senate to convict, but they’ll attempt it anyway. It wouldn’t surprise me if they attempted to impeach one or more Supreme Court justices.
Severe and draconian cut-backs on immigration of all kinds, in concert with brutal and cruel tactics and policies toward immigrants in custody. Family separation will look like a reasoned approach in comparison.
Deployment of the military in a domestic context. Probably to suppress a protest of some kind, posse comitatus be damned.
Complete failure to meet whatever public health or safety crisis rears it’s head a la COVID. Federal response to a natural disaster in a blue state will be lackluster at best.
Repeal of any number of pieces of legislation defining and protecting civil rights for minorities of all sorts.
Complete abandonment of Ukraine to Russia.
Much more robust support for Israel against Hamas (and Palestine in general; Trump and his administration won’t draw any distinction between the two) and a complete abandonment of any attempts at a cease-fire/truce/peace plan moving forward.
Some sort of aggressive military action in Mexico. I doubt anyone would go for an outright invasion, but I could see military operations against cartels in Mexico, with or without the consent and cooperation of the Mexican government.
Gutting of the EPA, CFPB, FTC, OSHA, FDA, enforcement programs and personnel at IRS, and any other regulatory and enforcement agencies that Republicans, FedSoc and their ilk don’t like.
Non-US poster here, so obviously most concerned with the disturbance to a stable world order. Countries like Russia, China, North Korea and Iran likely to feel emboldened to further their aims which could all too easily trigger escalation by a President who’s both terrifyingly incompetent as well as stunningly self-centred.
If the worst does come to pass in November, I’ll be shifting into defensive stocks like consumer staples - it’ll be only a matter of time before the global economy suffers through more war or terrorism.
John Bolton (who has never seen a war he didn’t love) predicts that within a year of Trump withdrawing from NATO, Russia will swallow the three Baltic states.
But here’s the worst. Trump will decided he likes being president so come 2028 he runs again. XXII Amendment, bah. Scotus will have ruled that states cannot keep an ineligible candidate off the ballot unless congress authorizes them to–and it won’t. Then Trump wins the election and electors vote for Trump. Congress counts the EVs and declares him the winner. Chief Justice Aileen Cannon swears him in and he is president-for-life.
As bad as all that is, it would get even worse after he dies. We’d have a modern version of what the Roman Empire experienced back in the day when a Caeser died.
Russia will have to kill around 2,000 Canadian troops in Latvia alone in the process. Along with 2,000 other NATO troops in Latvia, 2,000 in Estonia and 3700 in Lithuania. I don’t think Britain and France with their nuclear arsenals are going to just sit back and watch that happen.
Why not? It’s only 3 tiny countries with no important assets. Ukraine is huge and grows half the world’s wheat…and nobody really cares that Russia is destroying it. The west is willing to sit back and watch while 40 million Ukranians suffer, with a quarter million dead. Two thousand dead Canadian soldiers wont be worth starting a nuclear war.
If Trump wins, Russia will take a lot more territory.
No, direct attack on NATO troops would be a Really Big Fucking Deal, not a yawnfest as you imply.
The West clearly does care about Ukraine. Maybe not as much as they should, and no thanks to the Putin loving Republicans, but a lot of help has been and is being sent.
I agree with you this would be a big fucking deal but I’m not sure France, Canada or Britain would be up for a nuclear war when the US makes it clear they will not lift a finger to protect the Baltic States or take any action against Russia for killing NATO troops.
In this situation, I’m pretty sure we wouldn’t fire the first nuke. In fact, I know Canada won’t
But Russia might. The supposition is that Russia will kill the NATO troops in these countries, and successfully invade them. I don’t think that’s what would really happen. We saw how much trouble Russia had with invading Ukraine, and that was against a power that doesn’t have the same combined arms doctrines that NATO relies on. The troops on the ground would be backed up by air strikes from all over Europe, air strikes that the Russians would not be able to stop. Russia may have massive air defences inside Russia, but they won’t be bringing all that with them. Everything they send across the border will be wide open to attack, and we will attack them.
It’s only after that force is largely annihilated that we might worry about a Russian nuclear strike, as their last gasp effort to make the whole mess something more than a complete failure.
Agreed. And that would be true even absent a US force doing anything, on the orders of Generalissimo Trump. NATO in Europe is more than a match for what Russia can throw at them now (as opposed to what we thought they could throw a decade ago_
It really comes down to Trump doesn’t care about Ukraine. He couldn’t find it on a map. If he suddenly said, “Fund Urkaine bigly!”, the MAGAs would be tripping over each other to do so and screaming that the Dems are screwing their favorite country. The elected Rs would, of course, follow suit.
Perhaps I could have stated it clearer. Its not that he doesn’t care about Ukraine. Trump doesn’t care for Ukraine. Especially, after Zelensky wouldn’t bend the knee.