In this board’s long tradition of asking Jewish questions just as the Sabbath is starting, I have one.
There’s a list of criteria that must be fulfilled to properly rebuild the Temple. From what I’ve read, it’s generally considered impossible, or something only the Messiah can accomplish.
But the Temple was rebuilt once before. How was that accomplished? Why was the rebuilder at that time not consider the Messiah?
I’ve read through several Wikipedia articles, but they don’t answer these theological questions.
The Second Temple was built after the Babylonian exile. Most of the Hebrew Scriptures were written (or at least claims to have been written) before that time. So any biblical reference to a third temple coming in the messianic period would have to have been written in one of the few books written after the rebuilding of the temple (I’m only aware of Daniel fitting this criterion, the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical books are not accepted by the Jews).
The Second Temple remained standing from its completion to its destruction in 70AD. In the second century BC, the temple was desecrated by the Greeks and had to be rededicated.
The concept that the Messiah will build a third temple seems to have come from the commentary Laws of Kings, Ch 11, law 4, but I can’t trace it any further.
Well, one significant issue is that there is one particular site on which the Temple would, AFAIK, need to be (re-)built, and that site is holy to Muslims for a quite separate reason (it’s the earthly point whence Mohammed ascended to Heaven, according to their teachings, the which is commemorated by the Dome of the Rock, second only to the Qa’aba among Islamic holy places). This places a large practical barrier in the way.
A couple of questions for knowledgeable Jews: 1. Is He Who Restores the Temple ipso facto the Messiah according to Jewish eschatologocial thought? 2. Also according to Jewish eschatology, what are the prerequisites for restoration of the Temple?
I was wondering about the various Leviticus requirements, like having someone who can plausibly claim to be a Levite serve as priest, the red heifer necessary to be a proper sacrifice, etc.
No. But the modern State of Israel was founded by non-religious secular Jewish socialists who didn’t see any use of waiting patiently for some sort of future divinely ordained king.
Mrs. Plant points out that to be King, one must be anointed by a prophet. There can be no prophets because there is no temple. There can be no temple until mashiach builds it. There can be no mashiach until he is annointed King…
I’ve got a friend named Elijah who I think will vouch for me. Think that’ll count?
I’d need a full accounting of the required scriptural components (excluding all traditional or cultural ones) to becoming the Messiah before I can determine whether or not I can determine a reasonable scenario under which all the requirements can be filled (either by me, or an individual which I was to put into that position). This may be a task next at hand.