Reeder's Official Bush-Bashing Thread

As long as you’re immaculate.

Be it done unto me according to his word:D

Well, okay. But a Word to the wise:

If you are not immaculate
He will not ejaculate.

Oh I am so going to fry for that. :smiley:

Is it me, or do the title of this thread and OP suggest that the real purpose of this thread is a free-for-all bashing of Reeder, and not Bush?

That sounds like a job for mangeorge.

Heh. I love how many of the same voices that were crowing over december being banned over nothing are now crying foul. I guess “fair” is all in weather or not something agrees with your politics, hmm?

{Dolly Parton}
Get down off the cross Reeder, someone else needs the wood.
{/Dolly Parton}

Ah yes, the inevitable prayer to Saint december, SDMB martyr of the right.

Are you saying some folks are fair-whether friends of free speech? I wouldn’t want to rain on your parade.

That might be apropos if I was a Bush supporter, a Republican or a right winger. Since I am none of the 3, what is your point?

Crying foul?

Ducks are almost universally democrats.

OK, perhaps I misunderstood. When you said “crowing over december being banned for nothing” did you mean celebrating his banning, or protesting?

I meant celebrating. Lots of the more liberal posters celebrated december’s banning. Lots of liberal posters have mentioned in this thread that limiting Reeder to one thread to bash Bush is unfair, or censorship, or something else of the sort. I find this lack of ability to be objective interesting, although it’s unlikely it’s meaningful in any significant way.

Can you give any specific examples of folks who crowed about December’s banning making fowl utterances here, Weirddave?

I don’t think the comparison w/ December is valid. Those making that comparison seem to forget that he was not banned for starting too many junk threads, but for starting a GD thread where he deliberately alterred a quote from a source in his OP. That was the straw that broke the camel’s back in his case. AFAIK, Reeder has not done anything like that.

To be fair, I don’t think the situation is entirely analogous. It would be were Reeder banned, or had december been confined to one thread for his day and a halfly “Democrats can’t be up to any good” posts. As is now, I was pleased that december was banned, and I am pleased that Reeder is confined to this thread, though it does seem slightly offensive on a personal level. I would probably have been pleased had december been confined to one thread while feeling it was slightly offensive on that same personal level.

I find the arguments that Reeder is being censored to be extremely amusing, since there is no free speech on this board. We do not have the right to say anything; rather, we as guests of the ChiReader have the privilege. Furthermore, if you’re going to say Reeder’s free speech is being limited, where is the indignation at not being able to post full Blink182 lyrics (to cite an example Coldfire used a month or four ago in a somewhat similar situation)?

No, he can’t. He’s just pulling it out of his ass.

Except for Mallard Fillmore, you silly goose.

selective reading on your part - yes, there are some notable liberals unhappy w/this, but, as I pointed out to Reeder there’s nothing resembling a consensus