Here we see the now-standard Reeder posting style. Post a link that is anti-Bush, lay down a cheap little one-liner, and hit submit.
This is all very familiar. december has to this point been the finest example, but Reeder is soon going to overtake him as a One-Trick-Pony, a biased, liberal hack.
The only difference between the two right now is that Bush isn’t popular right now. december gets piled on simply for posting. Reeder doesn’t because he posts anti-Bush stuff.
Well, that doesn’t make it any less annoying than december’s stuff, IMO.
Just give it a rest, dude, or at least try to post something of substance for once.
Reeder, enough already. If you want to discuss Bush’s War, please do. But there is no need whatsoever to spam the Board with new threads on the same damn subject five times a day.
december at least puts some substance into his OP’s. He outlines a position, poses a question, etc.
Reeder is just some moron who discovered the wonders of the inter-web, and keeps posting links to news items, with a one-line quip. Fark and Drudge already take care of that.
Reeder is terribly stupid, no question there. But even worse are the morons posting the, “I like duh updayts!” in his OP’s. Right or Left, they are definitely part of the problem. Read a fucking paper, for Christ’s sake.
I just post what I read. As I’ve said before…if you don’t like what I post don’t read it. I checked the board FAQ…nothing there says you must open Reeders threads.
You didn’t embarass me, not one bit. I, unlike you, don’t pretend to have all the answers, and I say so when I don’t know.
Fact is, I never said I didn’t know what it was from. I didn’t but that again is proof that you assume too much. The Comp-time thread is proof. You assumed that people would be outraged at the idea. You were wrong, and now you have egg on your face, trying to salvage something out of nothing.
Hey, I like reading December posts and Ops. (Well, okay, I don’t care for the latest one about dwarf tossing.)
While I agree that Airman Doors, USAF has some legitimate complaints, I don’t feel that they are actionable complaints as the transgressions are minor and the sufficient remedy is readily available, (and already suggested).
In that context it was intended differently, kinda like “I don’t know, maybe Reeder’s being an ass?”. I thought it was obvious from the sarcasm coming afterward, but next time I’ll be more clear for you.
