I thought he was America’s Internet Blogger? Or is that The Most Trusted Name in Posting?
I need to balance my posting more. I’m a two or three forum pony. :o
Airman Doors, USAF…Where did I call you a weasel? I demand you show where I called you a weasel!
Squink…Impressive!..Thanks!
And now you play dumb.
Ring a bell? It wasn’t all that long ago.
Listen Wingnut doors…weaseling is a verb. A weasel is a noun.
Got that?
Of course you didn’t.
Airman Doors, I know that you served your country in Iraq and I have a lot of respect for that kind of courage.
But isn’t it the tradition of the military to fight for freedoms?
I have not followed most of Reeder’s links, but I do find his posts generally to be in agreement with my thinking. I don’t want to let that color my thinking on your OP.
If in GD Reeder is posting only links to Op Eds and other opinions (as opposed to factual material), and if he is making huge generalizations that cannot be substantiated except with anecdotal material, then maybe he can be compared with decemember.
I do remember that the link to the President’s comments on the possible looting of the WMDs was a news article and not Op Ed.
Maybe december links to reasonably unbiased sources and I just haven’t noticed.
Squink, is there an easy way to get stats like that? I mean getting the data, not coding it.
Damn…you’d think these Bushistas would at least bash with the intelligence of their namesake…
wait…
Great sig, [sub]if I used sigs 
[/sub]
I now realize that it is to my great luck that I don’t even know who Reeder is, never having opened one of his threads, at least that I remember.
Multiple searches, by forum. What with the atmosphere being filled with the impending promise of violent thunderstorms, I happened to be blessed with having no life this evening.
Bushista? Who, me? As usual, you’re not paying attention.
Once upon a time, maybe. Read some of my posts since I got back and then call me a Bushista. You’ll note that I am anything but. Come 2004 I’ll be voting Democrat for President, against all of my instincts.
This is about you and your spamming of repetitive and nonsensical anti-Bush threads. I tried to be nice to you about it, but with your two asinine contributions today you left me no choice.
um… looks to me like you did have a choice left to you. You could choose to read his threads or not. You chose to read them. Ergo, if anyone left you no choice but to pit him, it was you. 
BTW, if you were in Iraq, did you go thru Dover AFB to get over there?
Actually I wasn’t referring to you. It was aimed at Brutus. And I have never repeated anything. Have you seen any of what I posted on the mainstream media? No you haven’t. Because they are in Bush’s pocket. Someone needs to document all the lies and deceits. If it’s me…ok. If it’s you or others…all the better.
Boy, this is one of the more fun-to-read pit threads I’ve seen in a while.
Holy fuck, you are dense. You are not ‘documenting the lies and deceits’. You are just posting links to stories. Any dipshit can pull that off, so don’t try to pass of your spamming of GD as anything but spamming.
If I understand Brutus, he wants you to write 3 lines instead of one and have the link as an additional cite instead of a headline and then it’s ok in his book, because it is a “great debate” in that case
As for Reeder being the liberal december: Perhaps a liberal december is needed and long overdue as a counterbalance.
P.S.: Everyone who disagrees with me is… Ah, you know the rest, he he 
My irony meter just swung right into the red: Hypocrisy.
Thanks you for that. Ineeded a good laugh! 
Wouldn’t the definition of a weasel , for the purposes of our discussion, be “one who weasels”?
Why are you so damn obsessed with Dubya’s pants, Reeder?