One question: When you sneeze, and someone says, “God bless you” – do you give that person a lecture?
Because this seems to me to be one of the most pointless debates ever. People say what they say because that’s what seems to fit the circumstances. Not necessarily because of any true religious feeling.
Fact One: God drinks human tears. He fucking chugs them. This makes him a sort of vampire.
Fact Two: Vampires don’t appear in mirrors or electronic surveillance devices.
Fact Three: God’s roundhouse kick is more than powerful enough to cause a cave-in.
The only possible way to reconcile these facts is to state that there is no video tape.
So you’re saying that God isn’t omnipotent, right? Because if he’s omnipotent, he’s omniscient. And if he’s omniscient he knew that this cave-in would happen when he built the universe.
I’m sure you know how this works… they look to God for a way to save them and one was provided - they said their prayers and they were heard. You can’t change them by whether there is proof or not or by demanding an explanation or insisting on some sort of logic. Religion thrives on belief.
No amount of screaming “God is dead” or “it’s all a lie” moves them anymore than an Chrisitian screaming at you that God did this or that.
There has been no lack of gratitude expressed for the skills that made it possible for the miners to be rescued. Do you really think that those miners didn’t also thank the people whose cooperation and expertise and courage got them out? Expressing gratitude to God doesn’t imply that others aren’t thanked.
In answer to the OP, God is to be thanked by those who feel gratitude from a religious point of view. It wasn’t required. It appeared to be heart-felt. And since it hasn’t been out-lawed yet, why shouldn’t they choose to if that is their belief? Do you want to silence them?
Religion-as-placebo-effect is something I can at least understand, especially the homeopathic version: the less God in my life, the better it is for me.
That’s insulting to say the least. Implying the worst out of somebody you haven’t listened to simply to “win” by your agument “religion is always bad”.
The miners have thanked the other miners who helped them (with the football-related chant “Chi-chi-chi le-le-le, los mineros de Chile”), the rich guy who gave each family 5000 dollars, the president and everyone they can, the companies, the engineers. the people from other countries, every fucking person they could.
When you’re half a mile down in a hole with a 100-1 chance of ever getting out and avoiding a slow death, you are going to pray. Even if you are going to pray to a sense of God you were never sure of or even doubt. Its more compelling than buying a lottery ticket for the big jackpot.
When you get out, you feel compelled to thank that God for an answered prayer.
And that gratitude in no way detracts from the gratitude deserving for all those active in the rescue.
Oh, nonsense. People don’t bother praying to gods they don’t believe in. That’s just standard Christian “deep down, everyone knows God exists” propaganda.
No, I believe it’s just standard Christian “there’s no such thing as an atheist in a foxhole” propaganda. Because what better evidence for a kind, loving God than experiencing human suffering up close and personal?
You’re phrasing it as if you’re disagreeing but the whole idea of “there aren’t atheists in foxholes” is that everyone, deep, deep down knows that God is real and they’re just being contrary when they say that they don’t.
Exactly. I’m a genuine atheist, and I’d never pray no matter the danger; not because I’m unusually brave but because I don’t think there’s any point. I doubt it would even occur to me. It would be like a Christian praying to Zeus for deliverance; why would he even think of praying to a god he doesn’t believe in?
Christians have a problem grasping that other people may find their god just as unbelievable as they find Zeus or Odin.