Replies/Views a guide to thread quality?

Obviously, with a thread MUST be poular with a title like “Spit or Swallow? A followup poll TMI?” and with 762 replies and 12446 views.

However, if you see a thread with high views, yet low posts, does that mean that the content of the thread did not life up to what was expected by the title? For example: the “how young…?” thread with 7 replies but 224 views.

Does anyone check these as part of determining whether to open a thread?

I usually only look at post count - in two ways - if the post count is low and it’s near the top - it’s new. I like to post in new threads (If I have something worth saying)

I am a bit old fashioned so avoid the spit or swallow thread. (IMO a bit of a vulgar thing to be discussed on an international message board, but I aint going to do anything about it - just not post there)

In short - question 1 - answer - yes. question 2 - answer - not me.

If a thread has a lot of views and replies, but a title that otherwise wouldn’t interest me, I’d probably check it out. If a title interests me, I don’t really care about the post/view counts.

And I’m not sure the post/view counts are indicative of quality at all - popularity, yes, but not always quality (ok, so part of “Spit or Swallow” could be considered quality, unless you’re old fashioned, of course, but most of it’s pointless crap that I wouldn’t want to read, were I not taking a part in it…)

I don’t usually check either of them. If the subject interests me, then I go in and check it out.