I think at this point it’s almost a foregone conclusion that Hick will win. Tancredo, even if he pulled out (which his ego won’t allow), will confuzzle the Republicans enough to freak everybody out, and McInnis’ continued stubborn insistence that plagiarism isn’t a big deal isn’t going to help him at all.
I don’t know if you were kidding or not, but that’s exactly what Romanoff just did - sold his house and lent $325,000 to his own campaign
Dick Wadhams has intimated, and other political watchers have said outright, that this is what Tancredo’s going to do, if he already hasn’t done it - disgust so many Republicans with his antics that they’ll just stay home.
Listen to the link I gave of the two of them squaring off on talk radio on Monday, and once the host (Peter Boyles, a raving loon if there ever was one) gets involved, it does kinda sound like your description.
I think Romanoff’s going to beat Bennet. I don’t know anyone who really likes Bennet, and even the party leadership sounds really tepid in their support. It sounds like they are hedging their bets - privately hoping that Romanoff wins, while sticking to the party line of supporting the incumbent.
Romanoff’s been all over the media, while Bennet is only seen and heard from in commercials.
Your description of the Republicans makes it sound like neither of them is a good bet to win anyway, even if Tancredo disappears or had never been involved.
My new favorite political commercial has been of accused plagiarist Scott McInniss holding up a pen, and declaring it will be the pen he will use to slash taxes and create new jobs. I always ask him (or rather the image on tv) if that’s the pen he used for the alleged plagiarism. And then I just crack up.
I really think whoever thought that spot up wasn’t thinking properly.
I understand that ACP’s platform only calls for the elimination of congressional pensions, not salaries. Be that as it may, I can’t see anything wrong with Tancredo keeping the pay package that he agreed to when elected Congressman.
Personally, I think the Republican Party should be dismantled – any party that claims to have a budget alternative that inspection shows has not a single budget item or estimatedeserves to be laughed out of the room.
OTOH, I see that the Constitution Party seems to believe that 16th Amendment was never legally ratified; they appear to be in touch with their inner crank. They may very well lay claim to a substantial fraction of tea partiers. Good for them. It would be even better if the Republican candidate could explain why they make no sense.
Stunning because Bennet was the White House’s chosen candidate, is the incumbent, and has eight times as much money as Romanoff. He was also 17 points ahead a month and a half ago.
Calling it “Stunning” may be premature. Until a second poll comes out or an independent statistician weighs in, I’d characterize the results as “Interesting if true”.
[1] But the article says the poll was done by SurveyUSA, which I have heard of.