Republicans vs. Tea Party 1st shot fired in Colorado

Somehow the Colorado Republicans ended up with a purely establishment candidate vs. a Tea Party candidate with an incredibly thin record in the primary. Big mistake. The establishment candidate turns out to be a plagiarist (paid $300K for someone else’s work) while the Tea Party choice seems to have taken some serious liberty on his resume regarding his business success and his football prowess.

Failed presidential candidate Tom Tancredo has stepped in to the mess, demanding that the two Republicans drop out of the race or he will run on the ticket of the American Constitution Party. The chairman of the Colorado Republican Party is furious:

I am terribly disappointed in Tom Tancredo’s announcement that he has made a backroom deal with a minor political party to run for governor.

Tom Tancredo used the Colorado Republican Party to get elected to the Colorado House of Representatives in the 1970’s, to work as a political appointee in the Reagan administration in the 1980’s, and to get elected to Congress from 1998 to 2008. But now it appears he wants to destroy Republican chances to win a governor’s race after four failed years of Bill Ritter.

This past December, Tom Tancredo wrote a compelling op-ed calling on Tea Party and 9-12 activists to not form a third party because previous conservative third parties “succeeded in electing the more liberal candidate after many conservatives waste their votes on a third party candidate.” Tom Tancredo should remember his own words.

Let there be no mistake about it: Regardless of who our nominee is for governor after the primary, if Tom Tancredo carries through on his threat to run as a third party candidate, he will be responsible for the election of Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper as governor and for other races that will be imperiled as well.

The American Constitution Party’s platform calls for the elimination of congressional salaries and pensions. I assume when Tom Tancredo becomes that minor party’s nominee, he will forego his own congressional pension and will reimburse American taxpayers for the ten years of congressional salary he drew.

Body
Not long ago, state Republicans stood a decent chance at taking the Governor’s mansion when the current occupant, Dem Bill Ritter, left it at the end of his first term. Then the front runner in the Republican primary, Scott McInnes, self-immolated with the disclosure that he was paid $300,000 for a few essays on water rights that he in fact didn’t write and were plagiarised. The second candidate, Dan Maes, has a number of questionable assertions on his resume, including his record as a “sucessful” businessman (his reported income on his tax returns were below the poverty line for a couple of years) and his reported football prowess that nobody can find a record of.
<strong>
Enter Tom Tancredo.</strong>

In a stunning late afternoon development, Tancredo has demanded that both candidates must drop out of the race or he will enter it as the candidate of the American Constitution Party, whatever that is. Tancredo has effectively engineered that first great split between the Teabaggers and the Republican establishment, and the establishment is pissed. This is a complete meltdown of the right, and the best part is that Colorado’s next Governor, John Hickenlooper, hasn’t had to spend a dime to make it happen. Tom Tancredo always comes through in the clutch with a crazy move or statement.

http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/2010/07/22/tancredo-ultimatum-to-maes-and-mcinnis-get-out-or-im-in/12223/

Statement from Colorado Republican Chairman Dick Wadhams:

Where’d you. Copy/paste this from?

You left in HTML markings.

Sorry that it’s all messed up. Moderator cleanup on aisle GD?

Apparently you’re not the only one having formatting issues today. Half my post went missing and the other half… Well, random punctuation is random.

This guy seems like a hypocritical douche. Could he really be a spoiler after such hypocrisy?

I tell you what, this election season in Colorado has been entertaining, to say the least. At this point, it seems like a three-way WTF between Tancredo, McInnis, and the Tea Party candidate, Dan Maes, who recently had to pay $17,500 for financial impropriety.

Although Colorado politics are always a bit murky, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that Governor Hick is the future of CO for the next 6 years.

How did this become “Republicans vs. Tea Party”? It seems like they should both be pissed at Tancredo, not at each other.

For that matter, how much leeway do the Republicans have in the matter? Aren’t they governed by some sort of bylaws? Why bother holding a primary if they can just run whatever candidate they want? Is it part of Tancredo’s challenge that those candidates drop out and then he’ll be the Republican candidate?

I’ll bet that it’s a nominating convention.

9-12 activists? Is that a formatting issue or a real group?

That is a real group. They want America to be like we were on 9/12/2001. United, and terribly depressed and in deep shock.

and wanting to kill every Muslim.

And not shopping. Don’t forgot not shopping.

What’s so bad about Tancredo running? If, as you say, the Tea Partier is a liar about his success, and the Republican is a plagiarist, then the Democrat would have an easy enough time beating either or both of them. From what you say, Tancredo is the only conservative with a realistic chance of winning. I mean, it’s not his fault that the other guys are sabotaging his ideology’s success.

They already had it. That determined that Maes and McInnis would be in the primary.

If after the primary the winner drops out, a new nominee would be selected by a vacancy comittee, and that is what Tancredo would like to see. His name has been mentioned as a possible substitute. Tancredo could never win a state-wide race, but if he runs as a third-party candidate, he could certainly ensure that Hickenlooper wins.

I am vastly amused by this whole thing. The next edition of the dictionary will offer this story as the definition of circular firing squad.

If he wanted to run as a Republican, he had his chance. He could have attempted to gain a spot on the primary ballot via either the nominating convention or by petition. Now he thinks he sees a chance to strongarm his way in without actually having to do the work, and he’s using an unusually noxious (even for him) tactic in that attempt.

If he wants to run as a third-party or independent candidate, that’s certainly fine by me, but I can see why the Colorado Republican party leaders are peeved.

And he has no realistic chance of winning a state-wide race, not even one-on-one against Hickenlooper and not in a million years if the Republicans turn fratricidal.

Tancredo initially declined to run, so the Tea Partiers went with Maes. Tancredo is really the hero of the Tea Party with his rants about Obama and illegal aliens. They love Tancredo. Assuming the two don’t drop out (and they won’t), the Tea Party people will all flock to the American Constitution Party and cut the Republicans off at the knees.

A lot of people will be disgusted and just stay home, hurting Republican prospects all down the ticket.

So what’s Dick Lamm up to nowadays, that this shit continues on?
Someone go wake him up, quick!

[/QUOTE]
How did this become “Republicans vs. Tea Party”? It seems like they should both be pissed at Tancredo, not at each other.
[/QUOTE]

“Tea Party vs. Republicans vs. Sort-of-Tea-Party” was a bit unwieldy.

From the Denver Post:

Apparently, he can strongarm the Constitution Party candidate into withdrawing.

Well, duh. Some of us have known that for years.

In case someone might be interested, Tancredo and Wadhams were on Peter Boyles on Monday, and it totally degenerated into a three-for-all. Here’s the link if anyone wants to listen (and laugh while saying “WTF?”): Wadhams and Tancredo call each other liars on air

And yea, the Post reported today that Goss, the former Constitution Party candidate, has agreed to step aside.

This is more fun than a barrel of monkeys.

Tancredo will definitely draw more votes that Goss would have. His votes will also ensure that Hickenlooper is elected.

I think Goss and the party expect from this a long term improvement, and they shouldn’t. See Nader/Green Party in 2000 for an example.

I’ll be very interested in seeing how this shakes out down-ticket. If I were Romanoff, I’d sell my house if that’s what it took to win the Senate nomination against Bennet.

It could also help Betsy Markey in the 4th district if it discourages regular Republicans from voting in a district that, given a sound candidate, I would expect to return to Republican.