REQ: best/good celeb photo gallery website.

I am bored so I have decided to ogle famous ladies. In the past if I/we did a search for someone in particular we got websites dedicated to them. Nowadays we get toooooo many websites that cater for many celebs in one site, with small galleries of commonly seen small pictures. (rarely or never the hi-res newly posted magazine scan that were a feature of dedicated websites)

I give up on the dedicated ones. So I decided to ask, if I must use the all-celeb route then which one is the best? (has many more than the usual set, has hi-res pictures, has recent pictures, has updates)

Thanks (if this gets any replies)
Here is a forum with the right idea. (And here is a damn good reason to join! (Hootbot))

Bumping (Just once)

www.gettyimages.com has a plethora of good and free pictures of celebrities.

www.superiorpics.com has a reasonably good selection as well.

Clearly what you need is the “Celebrity Site of the Day”. Here.
Only the best quality celebrity sites are selected.

The superiorpics one is great! thanks. but the ‘celebrity site of the day’ one went insane with popups and things trying to install themselves. No thanks! (but thanks for trying)

@#%^$ The Celebrity Site of the Day just killed my machine with pop ups.

Darn it, Lob I wish I’d seen your warning post about a minute ago.

Hey, is there a version of superiorpics.com with male celebs?

ugo.com has all the beautiful famous ladies like Rachael Leigh Cook. Rrrwowr.

Dude! She’s pretty young (and very pretty).

:stuck_out_tongue:

Erm…
I didn’t know she was 15.
(famous last words)

But she is a surprisingly pretty girl to be part of the sad nerdy world of messageboard posting.

Yes, well… you and I are both stunning looking men, and we post.
Still, some girls/women defy instant age catagorization. Take Kirstan Dundst. I think she’s one of the prettiest people I have ever seen, even tho she’s just now USA legal. And my last ex-GF was 2 months older than me yet turned on guys and girls half her age because she just looked good. Period. (Pity she was such a bitch, tho) So, looks and age don’t always seem to match.

An amusing anecdote follows.

When I was about 24 or so (memories pile on top of each other when you’re looking back almost a score of years), I met a girl visiting a friend’s church. Wow! Did she look good. And she was witty, able to hold a conversation on both the most mundane and the deepest of subjects, and had goals and desires similar to mine.

Well, we chatted a few times on the phone and I asked her out. She still lived at home, but being Texas and all, I thought nothing of it. Lots of girls still lived with thier parents even in their early 20s.

Man oh man, this girl was it! She was beautiful in every respect, including (maybe especially) the non physical. An all around “Good Choice.”

With her being decent “church folk,” I hadn’t tried anything (you know what I mean) other than kissing and I was picking her up for our 4th date. Her parents had let me know it was her birthday, so I was going to treat her to a real nice evening. Very classy stuff.

Being the moron that I am, I realised I never knew her age. So, I asked her Mom. “15 today,” she answered.

Bong! goes my head.

I still took her out for that very classy evening. And the next day, I drove out to tell her we couldn’t date anymore. You know what? If she had asked me wait, I think I would’ve tried. But we all knew that was the end of it. :frowning:

The point of that story? Just because she’s pretty and smart doesn’t mean she’s of legal age or ready for lifelong commitment. Kind of odd on her parent’s part, too, I thought.
Still, Kirsten Dundst is hot, right?

www.atpictures.com

:slight_smile: