Probably a little on the softer side.
Maybe I can just have an air-soft gun?
Well that did seem to be the demographic the Republicans went all out for in the recent elections.
Not a problem. And at 200 yards.
Really? You remember how to integrate by parts?
Conservatives are such manly toughguys that they quake in fear of the day they won’t have 80 rounds magazines for their AR-15’s.
If you need to be surrounded by rapid fire death machines to feel safe, you are not manly, you are a pussy.
A Manly Man (short YouTube)
First, you’ve got to find the damned grizzly. I’ve spent a month, total, in Glacier National Park, and only briefly glimpsed one bear of any sort.
So we’re talking about a skill that’s got only slightly more utility than being able to repel incoming meteorites by psychic powers. 
If this is one of those My Aunt McGillicuddy riddles, I sure can’t figure it out.
Anybody else reading this thread and the one about the Sandy Hook Conspiracy Douchebags? I want to know if you’re also experiencing the same extreme cognitive dissonance.
I believe that conspiracy theorists are more aptly described as “loons”, though I’m hoping that our resident wordsmith, SenorBeef, can pop in to clarify. Also quite eager to find out how he labels liberal women. And I hope that nobody disagrees with him, or trots out any examples disproving his time tested theories, because they’re bound to be lame ass anyway, and they only serve to prove how scared that you are of stereotypes.
Conservative NRA loons are still conservative, insane though they may be.
If you want to pit liberal douchebag weeinies, you take the bad with the good for manly conservative macho male men. Exceptions just because they also happen to be nuts only muddies up the picture.
That’s simply not true.
It’s a box of hammers…
There’s plenty of evidence OP is correct. Here’s a movie clip depicting the sexiness of rugged conservative outdoorsmen.
What’s so great about traditional rugged men? They stink, are hairy, insensitive, dumb as a rock, and think salt and pepper are the only spices you need on a steak.
Us liberal doucheweenies are cultured, refined, empathetic, brilliant, funny, clean, and smell great! 
That’s because they smelled you coming.
That’s why when I go grizzly hunting I always carry some water and a washcloth.
First off, you’re a douchebag weenie for making a pit thread and not posting a link to it in the original thread. How was I supposed to know this was here? I rarely go into the pit. I only happened to catch it because it was the top thread on the forum index page.
Second, there was no sarcasm intended in my posts. I meant it. I think you read too much into what I was implying. I wasn’t saying “conservatives are manly, therefore better. Also, I’m a conservative, therefore manly. Watch me lift things.” or anything to that extent.
Clinging to traditional values brings a lot of bad with it. Racism, homophobia, sometimes insular values and anti-intellectualism, I’m not singing its praises. But people with those conservative values do tend to place a higher value on traditional male roles and “manly” traits. This is so obvious that I have a hard time thinking that anyone could seriously dispute it except to reflexively react against stereotyping. As with all of these, it’s a generalization - it doesn’t apply to every individual within the groups. I was careful to say “tends more than average” and relatively weak statements of that nature.
Third, you’re all a bunch of hypocrites. There is endless fucking bullshit psychology in these threads. Everyone is writing detailed speculation as to the psychology of all gun rights advocates and “gun nuts”. Oh, we all have small penises, we live in constant fear of the world, blah blah blah. And apparently this strikes you all as reasonable and level headed and not worthy of objection at all.
But if I make a similar statement, guessing at the motivations of gun control advocates - prefaced, no less, acknowledging that it’s my own little dimestore psychology conjecture - suddenly this is so outrageous that it must be parody. In fact, my characterization of the motivations of gun control advocates was actually quite a bit milder, less hyperbolic, and less ridiculous than the repeated characterizations going the other way. We have a guy equating gun ownership with slavery in that very fucking thread, and dozens of people on the boards playing up the same tired and stupid “small penises, scared of the world lololol” bullshit, and no one ever objects to that.
Why? Because it’s all a bunch fucking douchebag circle jerk on this issue. Whoever can give the most hyperbolic description of gun nuts, gun owners, gun rights advocates gets a fucking cum stained high five from all the others. You are not acting as the voice of reason, so stop patting yourself on the fucking back. The hypocrisy on this issue is absurdly transparent, and yet you are all so blind that even after it’s explicitly pointed out like this you’re almost certainly still oblivious.
Yes. But I shoot recurve bows, not guns. I admit I would consider a compound against a charging bear, though. Even though compounds are ordinarily for pussies.
Of course not. You meant “douchebag weenies” as a term of respect.
You must be new. Welcome to the Dope!