I have been with my company for 14 years. When I list my most recent three jobs, is it appropriate to show the last three jobs within my company as separate items?
example (ignore the form for now):
*EMPLOYMENT
Group Manager, ABC Company…August, 2003 - current
Maintained…
Implemented…
Created…
Department Mananger, TransUnion…April, 2001 - August, 2003
I do as much as will fill up a page (using one header per company saves some space. If any of the positions were minor, transitional (maybe you worked 2 weeks in a department and tranferred), or really irrelevant to the present job, AND you’re running out of space, just skip those.
To me, working for the same company is one job, but with different responsibilities and achievements.
So I would have a header with the company name and length of employment.
Beneath I would list any important (or relevant to your next job) positions within the company.
If you have stayed with a company for a while, it shows loyalty. If they gave you new responsibilities, it shows they appreciated you.
I do a big heading per company with smaller headings for jobs within a company. Some of my changes within a company have had fairly dramatic changes in job responsibilities. If it’s Billing Assistant, Billling Manager, Director of Accounts Receivable that’s a bit different from Billing Assistant, Payroll Manager, Director of Accounts Payable. The first situation is more amenable to combining the positions, the second one they should be broken out more.
Regarding functional resumes, you hear a lot about them. You may even hear them recommended by people who should know what they are talking about. I have had them recommended to me for reasons that made perfect sense. HOWEVER, after I read a couple multi-page threads on a human resources message board describing just how much they hate functional resumes, I redid mine. I am an HR person. I don’t personally hate functional resumes. But the facts of the matter seemed pretty clear–a lot of people who screen resumes hate them with the fire of 1000 suns. And, FWIW, response to my resume seems to have improved since I switched to chronological.
Not if you’re talking about big chunks of time. Recent grads, usually, yes, esp. since there tend to be a lot of summer jobs, internships, etc. People who have been in the workforce for a while – it doesn’t really matter if you started a job in April or May of 1996 if you’re still with the same company.