What’s a “wannabe-transsexual?”
The most appropriate term I could think of to describe the character.
In the books, the character “Wanda” desperately wants to transition from M to F. Towards that end, she dresses the part, certainly, and apparently has for some time. She may or may not be on hormones—I suspect that she is, since all she seems to be waiting for is the final surgery. But it is implied that she doesn’t have enough money for that yet. Wanda is in a kind of limbo, no longer a true male, but not quite yet a female. Being in this limbo is a key plot point in the storyline.
I did the best I could at the time. There may be a better term to use, but if there is, I don’t know it. But I’d appreciate learning of a better term, if there is one.
How fragile do you have to be to feel threatened by pudding?
The proper term would just be transgender. You don’t need surgery to be transgender.
The better term would be just “trans woman.” Trans identity isn’t predicated on receiving any particular surgery, or even publicly transitioning. A trans person isn’t less trans because they’re poor, or in an environment where it’s not safe to transition, or simply doesn’t feel they need surgery to confirm their gender, and suggesting that a person in one of those circumstances isn’t “truly” female is highly insulting.
You’re also misinterpreting that plot point:
Wanda isn’t prevented from traveling the moon bridge with Thessaly, Hazel and Foxglove because she hadn’t had bottom surgery - she’s prevented from traveling because the moon is a terf.
First of all, thanks, @Miller .
Secondly, thanks again. I’ll have to go back to the books, but I suspect you’re right about the Moon.
Overall thank you! Ignorance fought!
You’re welcome!
Okay, that’s a hilarious take on that.
You didn’t need to look at other boards - on this very board people were decrying the series making Death Black.
He’s probably the nicest person on YouTube; sure, the whole debacle drove engagement and that’s good for the algorithm and whatnot, but you can tell that this incident put a dent in his mental wellbeing, at least for a moment, and that’s horrible.
And the typical internet response to that problem will be ‘well, he should just grow a thicker skin; if he wants to be a YouTuber, he should be able to deal with it’, which is just victim-blaming and stupid; not having a ‘thick skin’ is part of the reason he is a lovely, gentle person.
You never want thick skin on your pudding.
I’m very sorry that this kind man was subjected to such idiocy.
“Crooked Joe wants to tell you you can’t have pudding if you don’t eat your meat. UNFAIR!”
People who are having a panic attack over a bowl of pudding have no business telling other people they should grow a thicker skin.
Oh definitely, these are the same people who get all bent out of shape about having no freedom of speech, when all that really happened is someone disagreed with them.