Yeah, brazzer has a point. By his reckoning, everyone who calls him names is by definition an asshole. When you know they’re all assholes, it doesn’t matter how many of them there are.
At the moment, no.
I don’t seem to have you on my shit list . . . were you posting before under a different nickname?
Wheras you were so original with your 'It is an honor to be insulted by jersk!" gambit? Sure.
Nah, always me, always my real name. Meh, I’m probably misremembering. It would have been years ago.
Well you didn’t predict it. But maybe that’s more a result of your your poor intelligence than my lack of originality.
Hedging for the day nobody unblocked remains?:dubious:
Wheras we only have your word for it that you predicted my comments Ms. Browne.
Yes, I made it up just to score rhetorical points :rolleyes:
Anyway, feel free to assume for the sake of argument that your post was completely original and unpredicted.
It doesn’t change the bottom line, which is that this exchange started with you asserting a conclusion without any specifics to support it.
I, for one, have zero problem believing that. Sounds about your speed.
You do seem determined to get pwnage at any cost.
Wheras your 'It is an honor to be insulted by the likes of you" is the epitome of originality, Mr. Bergerac?
My assertion was that you were a vile, disgusting human. I’d say that is self-evident at this point.
I have a feeling you are projecting, but let’s do this: Provide two specific things I have done which lend credibility to your hypothesis. Provide cites, actual quotes of me, and links.
In other words, put up or shut up. However I will predict right now with high confidence that you will do neither.
Well it did surprise you. But perhaps that’s more a result of your poor intelligence than my lack of originality.
Thank you again 
No. Not really.
Good for you Sylvia!!
:rolleyes:
God dammit Brazil, can’t you enter any thread without turning it to shit? You’re worse than Terr.
Damn. That’s cold.
I don’t know if they give out warnings in the Pit…but that’s probably close…
With luck, the moron will soon have most of the board in his retarded personal ignore list, and will no longer feel the need to post at all.
See, this?
This is exactly what I’m talking about.
You demand substantive rebuttals of completely substance-free idiocy.
MRA Inanity, ‘no u’, and attempting to reframe your ignorance as a virtue aren’t arguments, you inflamed bubo. Arguments would imply some vague suggestion of sapience, whereas your posts could be recreated by giving Cleverbot a PUA manual, Fox News talking point sheet, the Turner Diaries, and a list of logical fallacies.
If “substance-free idiocy” means “stuff you disagree with,” then you are probably right in a sense.
Here’s the first thing I said in this thread:
A simple, reasonable, logical argument. I posted the definition of a “catch 22” and explained why it does not apply to the elevator situation.
And yet you (apparently) dismiss it as “MRA inanity.” Without any kind of substantive response.
So when you accuse me of being the “anti-truth” you are describing yourself.