It’s as if the words and thoughts coming out of his mouth see an opening and try to make a run for it because they can’t take another second of being trapped inside that fucking moron’s orange skull.
I can see one of the GOP toadies asking Mueller- “Did you terminate the emails? Terminate… with extreme prejudice?”
Democrats need to be huddling non-stop until the testimony. Get the ducks in a row, figure out which questions to ask that will corner Mueller into giving the most damning testimony against the orange baboon and his evil minion Barr. Get some of those prosecutors who signed that letter to advise them how to ask the right questions and how to follow up. This is a chance to seriously damage this corrupt administration in such a way that “NO COLLUSION NO OBSTRUCTION” no longer works.
In general, that’s true, but I think there’s still some value to be gained from having him repeat stuff that’s in the report that gets lied about or misrepresented. For instance, if you listen to a lot of conservative media then you might be under the impression that the probe began with FBI and Deep State agents illegally spying on the campaign as well as Democratic Party collusion with foreign intelligence services to make up dirt on Trump. Having Mueller deny that stuff on the record can’t hurt.
Despite Mueller’s intention to only stick to the report, there are legitimate process questions that he should be expected to answer. For instance, Trump claims that Mueller investigated his taxes and finances and that they must be perfectly fine or Mueller would have said something. That’s not in the report, but I think it would be fair for him to answer on the record whether that’s true (it’s clearly not true). And to straight up ask if he really found “no collusion” and “no obstruction”, for another.
You were comfortable with Barr speaking for Mueller though, so I’m gonna go ahead and be riveted by hearing directly from Mueller.
like