It’s 50. Here, once again, is the RCP average of all polls. One poll has him at 56%, if you want to play a game of cherry-picking polls. Even Fox News has him at 50%, for fuck’s sake.
By the way, we don’t say “u” around here, and we use proper capitalization. The Hannah Montanna forum is down the hall (watch out for Chris Hansen).
That’s borderline cherrypicking. I don’t now how credible all the different polls in that Rasmussen tracker are - and thinking back to the election I don’t think they were all that GOOD - but that’s a better cite than yours.
None of which answers why we should care if it’s 46 or 50, but we’re too far down the road to go back and figure that one out.
That link gives numbers of (for January 21, 2010) 47% approve, 52% disapprove. You’re quoting some completely different metric involving opinions prefixed with “strongly”, which is not what anyone is discussing in this thread.
Wow, what an ingeniously tendentious formula. Rasmussen is only counting the difference between “stronglys,” not the difference between “approve/disapprove.” You are certainly welcome to comfort yourself with this meaningless figure if you want. Obama’s aggregate approval ratings still remain quite safe, though, even exceptionally so given the economic and military catastrophes he inherited from Bush.
I already said it wasn’t. I also don’t think 46 percent in one poll is as good a measurement as 50 from a bunch of polls - and I’m not sure why anybody cares in the first place. Even Obama knew his poll numbers were going to dive after he’d been in office a few months.
So what did draw you to this conversation, Venetian? Doing very thorough research on Diogenes of Sinope? Typed “46%” into Google and pressed “I’m feeling lucky?”