I guess you just can’t please a woman.
http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/tallahassee/news/politics/8902292.htm
Why am I not surprised.
The above link seems a bit wonky…so heres some others
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,122509,00.html
http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/entertainment/index.ssf?/base/entertainment-2/108699986517040.xml
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38925
beagledave chooses not to speculate on the interesting timing of the announcement.
What’s interesting about the timing? Is it the coinciding with RR’s dirt-nap or something else?
Uh-huh. Because liberal pundits never get divorced, right? :rolleyes:
Timing? Does this have some significance with Reagan I’m not seeing?
Merged Reeder’s new thread on the same topic, just for those who are hopelessly confused by now.
TVeblen
Rush…Bush…
Coincidence? I think not. Something in your head must force you to type the three letter combination -ush without you even knowing it.
Let’s try a sentence. Rush got thrush in his tush while campaigning for Bush the lush, who was eating mush when his nose started bleeding with a gush.
That’s just to get you started, because Rush is an idiot and nobody really cares about his marital status anyway except for you, so we might as well make this thread entertaining somehow.
More cynical posters might speculate that by releasing the news of his 3rd divorce AFTER the news show deadlines…AND on the same day as something (state funeral) that is going to occupy a ton of news coverage…that he might be trying to fly this under the radar,
More cynical posters might speculate that…but no, not me. 
Liberal pundits don’t tend to expound much on family values either. But still, there’s no need to take pleasure in anothers misfortune.
See “hypocrisy: noun.” Still confused? If so, there’s no helping you.
By the way, Rush is not a “pundit.” Rush is just a loudmouthed ass.
FTR (since I co-started, I guess, this thread)…I don’t take “pleasure” in ANY misfortune like a marriage breakup.
Pointing out the irony of the event, for a public figure who has taken outspoken positions on the “institution of marriage” being undermined by gays…is certainly fair game in my book.
So you created a thread with beagledave’s Title, and Reeder as the OP :eek:
That’s just UNHOLY !
It’s an interesting tidbit of news, but . . . eh. A lot of people get divorced. Perfectly wonderful, decent people get divorced. People who are strongly “pro-family” get divorced. People who preach about the importance of marriage get divorced. It is one of those things. Sometimes it’s because one or more of the parties messed up big time, but sometimes it’s not.
Since I have no idea why Limbaugh is getting a divorce, I really have no opinion about what this says about him.
Well, I hardly think he was planning on the Reagan thing … but releasing it Friday afternoon? Oh, yeah.
Imagine how I felt when I saw MY title but HIS leading post.
Veb don’t like me…this is just her way to show it.
Nah…she liked your title…my op.
Just imagine me when I clicked your thread and found my op.
:eek:
Yeah, but most people don’t get divorced three times!
Who knows? Rush may argue that the Massachusets weddings were what undermined his marriage. You may be next! :eek: