Rush Limbaugh defends rapists and murderers

Yeha, but they’re Christian rapists and murderers. And most of them are Children. Won’t someone think of the children rapists and murderes?

Actually, I don’t think he can lie very well. His lies are pretty transparent.

I’m actually going to bet (in the lame sense that involves no actual money) that Limbaugh backs this one out somehow; too many people who he (and his audience) would grant credit to (mainly evangelical Christian missionaries) can speak with some authority about what horrible people the LRA are. Witness Qin’s reaction in the Great Debates thread.

:slight_smile:

I"d be happy if he came up with something simple like the following:

“I’m sorry, but I’m a total partisan hack who babbles incoherently. I let my unreasoning hatred of Obama get in the way of any sense of facts or analysis or common sense. I’m a tool, a douchebag, a complete waste of skin. Goodbye forever.”

I’ve never listened to him for more than a minute or two at a time, and probably not more than 15 minutes total. Has he ever back-tracked on anything, or does he just move on to something else?

Did he make a big deal about this on his radio show? If not, then he can just sort of pretend it was some side issue on his web site of no real import.

And here I thought from the title of the thread that Rush was defending the Clintons

And my first thought was Haliburton!

However, I am willing to put up a similarly lame internet-bet that before he does, some moron on the internet somewhere will have gleefully leapt on this incident to try to argue that Obama’s attack on these Ugandan Christians is just further proof that he’s a secret Muslim.

When it comes to the Obama-haters, there’s just no bottom to the stupidity. Some of the extremist Bush-haters could be pretty stupid themselves at times with hysterically exaggerated comparisons of Bush to Hitler and stuff like that, but at least they were reasonably grounded in reality on the fundamental issues of who he was and what he wanted.

The extremist Obama-haters might just as well be claiming that Obama is actually Count Dracula attempting to turn the whole nation into vampires for all the sense they make about him.

What thread?

Dude, this isn’t about Rush’s lies. It’s about people can either buy into the program or not. Rush can’t make you do anything. If you accept Rush’s pronouncement’s–congratulations, you’ve made a choice!

Was it a good choice? A bad choice? Time will tell; as well as your ability to learn from it.

Hopefully, I hope you’ll understand that I’m pointing out choices we make and that Rush’s ideology is only a means to an end. I’ll be the first to admit, that not for the first time, I’ve had difficulty getting my main point across on this message board.

My argument wasn’t a litmus test about Rush per se.

Obams [sic] Sends Ground Troops to Africa.

You’re still deflecting away from the fact that he’s an unethical piece of shit.

Okay, he’s a piece of shit. Happy now?

That’s ridiculous. Don’t blame him for something he says? Blame the people who listen to him? What’s wrong with blaming both, but a special blame on him since he’s the one who instigated the whole thing?

Sure, he’s not the first person to spread lies and misinformation. So what? This is a particular case that is being called out, and Rush is the source.

Quite.

Really, the fact that he’s legally untouchable for his speech means that those who oppose him must exert their opposition via more speech. You can’t just leave Limbaugh or whoever’s peddling bullshit alone and assume the truth will eventually out. They’ve got to be called on it, even if only to try to persuade the audience away.

And yes, I’m totally doing a pisspoor job of that, but I ain’t getting paid to elocute.

Don’t you yurpeans insult the Lord. Everyone knows God wrote the Bible in American.

A repeat of his opposition to Clinton’s intervention in the massacre of Bosnians. “those people have been killing each other for centuries! Why should we make it our business?”

“Not worth the bones of a Pomeranian grenadier,” unless it’s a Pomeranian puppy on Grenada that a Republican president wants to save.

Yeah, but the Holy Spirit sucks as an editor. Always running around with a sheet over his head…

I’m quite glad he has acknowledged this, since for years on the SDMB whenever people have said ridiculous stuff like “if there are ordinary decent Muslims then why aren’t they apologising for [latest Islamist outrage]?” I’ve asked in return whether ordinary decent Christians have apologised for the LRA yet.

Anyone else think that Rush should apologise on behalf of the LRA for all the child raping?