…over its recently passed anti-gay laws. CNN gives the gist of a vague at best law that has Olympians and human rights activists alike scratching their chins over its application;
A 320,000 signature petition protesting the Russian law has been passed to the IOC and Stephen Fry has composed an open letter to British PM Cameron and the IOC calling for a boycott and comparing the situation to Nazi Germany’s hosting;
What do you make of the situation? Would you support a boycott of next year’s games over Russia’s draconian scapegoating or is it best to ignore it and compete regardless?
People can and will protest any way they like… but in what possible way is Russia less free now than it was in 1980, when British athletes happily competed at the Moscow Olympics?
Nothing much will come of it, athletes will attend, the Olympics will go on as planned, and life will go on.
I wouldn’t support a boycott, though I don’t support boycotting the Olympics pretty much anywhere. It’s a diverse and sometimes weird world and countries that are heavily involved in the Olympics should get a chance to host it, not matter their racists or other prejudice ideas. I fully, fully supported China getting the Olympics despite their own human rights records, which I would imagine include very poor treatment of any outspoken gay community.
Now that I think of it, I’m not sure I’d boycott the Olympics anywhere, especially if the country is one that regularly sends athletes to it.
However, don’t you think it would also be incumbent on the host country to ensure that the athletes are free to compete without worrying about being arrested for speech/actions that don’t violate the Olympic charter? Obviously, the IOC seems to feel this way. In other words, if (by some miracle or corrupt process), Saudi Arabia were to host an Olympic event, shouldn’t female athletes get to participate without worrying about the religious police?
I do think that if enough pressure is pushed on the advertisers (aka “Official Sponsors”) that Russia’s position would be moot and that it would switch locations in order to keep it a worthwhile financial endeavor. The athletes would essentially become the pawns in the game.
What part of “miracle” or “corrupt process” do you not understand? Many people said it would be impossible to have a World Cup in the Qatar due to the overwhelming heat, but…
Surely the more constructive solution (as opposed to boycotting) is to have athletes go to the games, bring rainbow logos, speak in favor of gay rights, and dare Russia to do anything about it. (Hint: They won’t.)
Is that constructive? Or would that just let everyone have their fun games while native gay russians continue to be harassed and attacked in the background?
It at least gets the message heard, in a way that will be difficult to impossible for the Putin government to censor or spin. Yes, a boycott will also get the message heard, but in a way that will infuriate the average Russian, penalize blameless athletes, and be spun by Putin as an example of generic Western hatred of Russia.