It’s an external power interfering in the internal affairs of a weaker sovereign state. It is also very similar to the Czech Sudetenland; I wonder how long it will be before the Russians decide the situation in the rest of Ukraine is too disturbed that they need to find some locals elsewhere to invite them in there too.
I would not compare Putin to Stalin as much as to Katherine the Great. He is an imperialist.
How could you possibly be confused? Russian military moved in before they voted to join. Also the Tartars make up about 12% of Crimea’s population who would almost certainly voted against joining Russia. So for some reason their voices aren’t reflected in this referendum.
Ukraine was “part of Russia” before 1992 in the same manner as Crimea was “part of Ukraine” after 1992 - as an autonomous region that is part of the country. In fact, as “part of Russia” Ukraine had less autonomy than Crimea had before the current events.
No, Ukraine was part of the USSR; Russia was another, separate entity within the USSR. It was all just “Russia” under the tsars, every province having a Crown-appointed governor, but the Bolsheviks, despite being internationalists in principle, also had a lot of high-minded ideas about national self-determination, so long as the nation self-determines to follow the vanguard party; hence the complex system they created of “union republics,” “autonomous republics,” “autonomous oblasts,” etc., for every ethnic/national group concentrated in a definable territory. The USSR was like a Russian matryushka nesting-doll, except that when you open the biggest doll you find 15 next-size dolls inside instead of one, and each of those has a different number of dolls inside it and so on. Which is why the collapse of the USSR left the 15 union republics as independent states, but then some of them had unresolved nationalist problems within their borders, nationalities who already had their own local governments and now wanted outright independence, such as Chechnya and Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
Maybe, but in practice, it was the same old Moscovite kingdom. The U.S.S.R was nothing more than the Russian empire under new management, and neither Ukraine nor any of the other 13 “republics” were equal partners.
Trust me, I lived in the USSR for 16 years. The distinction between “Russia” and “USSR” was extremely blurry. “Russia” and “Soviet Union” were freely interchangeable in the language and in the minds of the citizens.
Ask someone from Kiev, whether Russian or Ukrainian, in 1980 if he was living in Russia. Most would answer yes. “V Rossii, na Ukraine”. As I said, Russia and “Soviet Union” were interchangeable.
This may have been true in theory, but in reality everyone in the USSR since the 1920s or so viewed the USSR as more or less a modern successor to the Russian Empire, and the notion of “national self-determination” as more or less a bad joke. Hence, for example, “Russification” in Ukraine, and the attack on “nationalist deviation”.
The current crisis is really just another round of this process, which has been going on since the time of the Tsars.
USA will never be isolationist as long as the elites which run the country since WW2 run it.
Whether its Obama, Bush, Democratic, Republican…As long as the USA has the funds, it will play the game of geopolitics.
USA knows very damn well: In Modern World if you’re strong and neutral it makes no sense. China, Russia, hell even Brazil, India, etc…They will eat the pie you leave on the table.
USA is world police not because of some sense of democracy or being good guys.
USA is evil state like all other states, and just plays in the giant game of chess played across the world.
No, American ignorance was thinking that the Cold War had anything to do with Communism. Communism was nothing more than the tool Russia used to maintain and project power.